首页> 外文期刊>Nursing forum >An analysis of a mentoring program for baccalaureate nursing students: does the past still influence the present?
【24h】

An analysis of a mentoring program for baccalaureate nursing students: does the past still influence the present?

机译:对学士学位护理学生指导计划的分析:过去仍然影响现在吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In September 1999, the nursing alumni association of a large university on the West Coast launched a mentoring program for nursing undergraduate students: 120 students (50% of the student body) joined the program and 60 community nurses, representing a myriad of specialties, roles, and educational levels (diploma program to doctorate), agreed to volunteer their time as mentors. The program had been carefully planned using a survey done the previous year with 95% (296) of the student body asking their opinions on program components and design. A successful 9-month pilot study was then done with 13 students matched with 13 mentors. Yet, over the next 4 years, enrollment of the students dropped to less than 1/3 the original number. Care was taken to observe the changes in enthusiasm and to address problems with the entire group: mentors and students. After 5 years, the person chairing the program needed to leave-the transition with new leadership was never successful. Part of this resulted from problems in transition but the larger issue concerned the trend that had already been identified. The aim of this paper is to discuss the problems encountered during the program from a perspective of the context within which the program was developed and the history of mentoring in the profession of nursing. The present carries the inheritance of the past. Historically, nurses and women were not expected to need mentors-"trained nurses" did not need mentoring and women were expected to have temporary jobs which they left for marriage and mothering. The paper explores the historical question: Does the history of mentoring in nursing still influence nurses today, making it challenging to establish the relationships essential to the success of mentoring?
机译:1999年9月,西海岸一所大型大学的护理校友会启动了一项针对护理本科生的指导计划:120名学生(占学生人数的50%)加入了该计划,并有60名社区护士,代表了无数的专业,角色,教育程度(文凭课程为博士学位),同意自愿担任导师的时间。该课程是根据上一年进行的一项调查精心计划的,有95%(296)的学生团体就课程组成和设计征询他们的意见。然后,成功进行了为期9个月的试点研究,对13名学生和13名导师进行了研究。然而,在接下来的4年中,学生的入学率下降到不到原始人数的1/3。注意观察热情的变化,并解决整个小组的问题:导师和学生。 5年后,主持该计划的人需要离开-新领导的过渡从未成功。部分原因是过渡中的问题,但更大的问题涉及已经确定的趋势。本文的目的是从开发程序的环境和护理专业的指导历史的角度来讨论程序中遇到的问题。现在承载着过去的继承。从历史上看,护士和妇女都不需要导师,“训练有素的护士”不需要导师,而且妇女应该有临时工作,她们可以结婚和做母亲。本文探讨了一个历史性的问题:护理学中的指导历史是否仍会影响当今的护士,使其难以建立成功指导所必需的关系?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号