Why Norwegian 2005 guidelines differs slightly from the ERC guidelines.

Lexow K; Sunde K

首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Why Norwegian 2005 guidelines differs slightly from the ERC guidelines.

【24h】

Why Norwegian 2005 guidelines differs slightly from the ERC guidelines.

机译：为什么Norwegian 2005指南与ERC指南略有不同。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The national Norwegian algorithm for adult advanced life support differs slightly from the standard ERC guidelines. In accordance with the agreement between the Norwegian resuscitation council and ERC, such deviations should be explained. The Norwegian resuscitation council (NRC) has thoroughly discussed the arguments for these small, but in our opinion, important and well-founded deviations. The board of the NRC has consulted leading resuscitation experts of all five universities in Norway before taking final decisions. Through an open and dedicated process the board managed to achieve a national consensus for the new Norwegian adult advanced life support algorithm. The reasons for the deviations from the ERC guidelines are presented below.

机译：挪威国家成人高级生活保障算法与标准ERC指南略有不同。根据挪威复苏委员会和ERC之间的协议，应解释这种偏差。挪威复苏委员会（NRC）彻底讨论了这些微小但有充分根据的偏差的论点。在做出最终决定之前，NRC理事会已咨询了挪威所有五所大学的领先复苏专家。通过开放和专门的流程，董事会成功地针对新的挪威成人高级生命支持算法达成了全国共识。下面列出了偏离ERC准则的原因。

著录项

来源
《Resuscitation.》 |2007年第3期|共3页
作者
Lexow K; Sunde K;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类治疗学;
关键词
guiding characteristics; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography;

机译：指导特征;内镜逆行胆管造影;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Why Norwegian 2005 guidelines differs slightly from the ERC guidelines. [J] . Lexow K, Sunde K Resuscitation. . 2007,第3期

机译：为什么Norwegian 2005指南与ERC指南略有不同。
2. 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. [J] . Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC J Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association . 2009,第22期

机译：2009年重点更新：STC升高性心肌梗死患者的ACC / AHA管理指南（更新了2004年指南和2007年重点更新）和ACC / AHA / SCAI经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南（更新了2005年指南和2007年重点更新）：美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告。
3. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of patients with peripheral artery disease (Updating the 2005 Guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. [J] . Anonymous Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association . 2011,第18期

机译：2011年ACCF / AHA重点处理《外周动脉疾病患者治疗指南》（2005年指南的更新）：美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会特别工作组关于实践指南的报告。
4. From paper-based to electronic guidelines: application to French guidelines. [C] . Gillois P, Chatellier G, Jaulent MC, MEDINFO . 2001

机译：从纸张为基于电子指南：向法语指南申请。
5. Driver-Array Based Flat-Panel Loudspeakers: Theoretical Background and Design Guidelines. [D] . Anderson, David Allan. 2017

机译：基于驱动器阵列的平板扬声器：理论背景和设计指南。
6. Comparison of the quality of basic life support provided by rescuers trained using the 2005 or 2010 ERC guidelines [O] . Christopher M Jones, Andrew Owen, Christopher J Thorne, 2012

机译：比较接受2005年或2010年ERC指南培训的救援人员提供的基本生活支持的质量
7. Comparison of the quality of basic life support provided by rescuers trained using the 2005 or 2010 ERC guidelines [O] . Christopher M Jones, Andrew Owen, Christopher J Thorne, 2012

机译：比较接受2005年或2010年ERC指南培训的救援人员提供的基本生活支持的质量
8. Main-Coolant-Pump Shaft-Seal Guidelines. Volume 3. Specification Guidelines. Final Report (PWR; BWR) [R] . Fair, C. E., Greer, A. O. 1983

机译：主冷却剂 - 泵轴 - 密封指南。第3卷。规范指南。最终报告（pWR; BWR）

Why Norwegian 2005 guidelines differs slightly from the ERC guidelines.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅