...
首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America >Possible pathogenic mechanisms in inflammatory myopathies.
【24h】

Possible pathogenic mechanisms in inflammatory myopathies.

机译:炎症性肌病的可能致病机制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The limitations associated with the different approaches into the pathogenesis of the IIM have resulted in incomplete knowledge of disease mechanisms in myositis. In most research, in which muscle tissue was used to study the different aspects of disease, biopsies with inflammatory infiltrates have been selected. Although inflammatory cell infiltrates are a characteristic feature of myositis, selecting patients with inflammatory cell infiltrates for investigations naturally introduces a selection bias. Only a few studies have been published on patients without inflammatory infiltrates but with muscle weakness, and few studies have included follow-up biopsies after different therapies. The heterogeneity of the population of patients with myositis is another limitation of the studies of pathogenic mechanisms. Although most studies classify patients according to the Bohan and Peter criteria [118, 119], some studies used histopathologic criteria [6], and only a few studies included characterization with myositis-specific autoantibodies. Because myositis-specific autoantibodies are often associated with certain clinical profiles, classification according to autoantibody profiles could be important to define differences in the pathogenesis of different phenotypes [3]. From available data on pathogenic mechanisms it is evident that cellular and humoral immune responses are involved in disease mechanisms of myositis, but whether there is a muscle-specific immune response cannot be answered by current studies. It is likely that other mechanisms are important for development of muscle weakness, including metabolic disturbances, and muscle weakness could be caused by different mechanisms in different IIM subsets or in patients in different phases of the disease. There could be early changes, which reversibly affect the metabolism, and later, irreversible changes, that could be dependent on muscle fiber damage and replacement of muscle tissue by connective tissue and fat. Current findings suggest that cytokines, which are produced in muscle tissue from different cell sources including inflammatory cells, endothelial cells, and muscle fibers, could affect muscle function. Careful follow-up studies, including the effect of therapies targeting different molecules on molecular expression in muscle tissue, are likely to increase our knowledge on disease mechanisms. A better understanding of which molecules and mechanisms affect muscle function is likely to lead to improved, less toxic therapies in patients with myositis. Many possible target molecules for blocking therapies, especially the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1 and TNF-alpha, have been identified and should be studied in appropriate clinical settings given the currently poor outcomes of many patients with IIM.
机译:与IIM发病机理的不同方法相关的局限性导致对肌炎的疾病机制的认识不完整。在大多数使用肌肉组织研究疾病不同方面的研究中,已经选择了具有炎性浸润的活检组织。尽管炎性细胞浸润是肌炎的特征,但选择具有炎性细胞浸润的患者进行研究自然会带来选择偏倚。对于没有炎性浸润但有肌肉无力的患者,只有很少的研究发表,很少有研究包括在不同疗法后的随访活检。肌炎患者群体的异质性是致病机制研究的另一个限制。尽管大多数研究根据Bohan和Peter的标准对患者进行分类[118,119],但一些研究使用了组织病理学标准[6],只有少数研究包含了肌炎特异性自身抗体的特征。由于肌炎特异性自身抗体通常与某些临床特征相关,因此根据自身抗体特征进行分类对于定义不同表型的发病机制中的差异可能很重要[3]。从有关致病机制的可用数据来看,很明显细胞和体液免疫反应与肌炎的疾病机制有关,但是当前的研究无法回答是否存在肌肉特异性免疫反应。其他机制可能对肌肉无力的发展也很重要,包括代谢紊乱,并且肌肉无力可能是由不同IIM亚群或疾病不同阶段患者的不同机制引起的。可能会出现早期变化,从而可逆地影响新陈代谢,之后可能发生不可逆的变化,这可能取决于肌肉纤维损伤以及结缔组织和脂肪对肌肉组织的替代。目前的发现表明,在肌肉组织中,从包括炎性细胞,内皮细胞和肌纤维在内的不同细胞来源产生的细胞因子可能会影响肌肉功能。认真的后续研究,包括针对不同分子的疗法对肌肉组织中分子表达的影响,可能会增加我们对疾病机制的认识。更好地了解哪些分子和机制会影响肌肉功能,可能会导致肌炎患者获得更好的,毒性更低的疗法。已经确定了许多可能用于阻断疗法的靶分子,尤其是促炎细胞因子IL-1和TNF-α,鉴于许多IIM患者目前的预后不良,应该在适当的临床环境中进行研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号