...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Class Action Royalty and Royalty Interests: Netback Methodology; First Marketable Product Doctrine Limitations of Action: Fraudulent Concealment Doctrine
【24h】

Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Class Action Royalty and Royalty Interests: Netback Methodology; First Marketable Product Doctrine Limitations of Action: Fraudulent Concealment Doctrine

机译：法院管辖权，程序和审查：集体诉讼特许权使用费和特许权使用费：Netback方法论;第一种可销售产品原则的行为限制：欺诈性隐瞒原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In earlier litigation, Patterson v. BP America Production Co., 185 P.3d 811,167 0.&G.R. 405 (Colo. 2008), the Colorado Supreme Court remanded the putative class action back to the trial court after determining mat absent a showing of fraudulent concealment, the statute of limitations would accrue when the payment is due not when the party should have discovered the existence of the cause of action. On remand, the trial court is faced with a slightly revised putative class of leasehold and overriding royalty interest owners whose royalties were calculated during the period January 1, 1986 through December 1, 1997 using the netback methodology to deduct post-production costs in order to make the natural gas marketable. The trial court issues an extensive ruling covering not only the statute of limitations/fraudulent concealment issue but all of the elements required to certify a class under C.R.C.P. 23. It certifies the class after finding mat the defendant actively attempted to conceal from the class members its use of the netback methodology to lower the amount of royalty paid. Held: affirmed. While the plaintiff bears the burden of proof to show mat all of the elements of C.R.C.P. 23 have been met, Colorado takes a liberal construction to C.R.C.P. 23 so as to favor class certification. The Court of Appeals determines that the putative class easily meets the numerosity requirement rejecting BP's claims that since the netback methodology was implemented over a period of time following natural gas price deregulation, it cannot determine the number of individuals who would be in the class.
机译：在较早的诉讼中，Patterson诉BP America Production Co.，案卷185 P.3d 811,167 0。 405（Colo。2008），科罗拉多最高法院在确定席位没有欺诈性隐瞒的情况下，将推定的集体诉讼发回了初审法院，当付款到期而不是当事方本应在诉讼中发现被告人时，将适用时效法规。诉讼因由的存在。在还押时，初审法院面临稍作修改的推定的租赁权和压倒多数的特许权所有者，其特许权使用费是在1986年1月1日至1997年12月1日期间计算的，使用净额法扣除后期制作成本，以便使天然气适销对路。初审法院发布了广泛的裁决，不仅涵盖时效/欺诈性隐瞒问题，还包括证明C.R.C.P. 23.它在找到被告积极地试图向集体成员隐瞒其使用netback方法来降低已支付的特许权使用费后，向集体证明。举行：肯定。尽管原告承担举证责任，以证明C.R.C.P.已经达到23点了，科罗拉多州将自由主义建筑纳入C.R.C.P. 23，以便支持班级认证。上诉法院裁定推定的类别很容易满足数字要求，驳回了BP的说法，因为净价格法是在天然气价格放松管制后的一段时间内实施的，因此无法确定参与该类别的人数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号