首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia bulletin >Lack of use in the literature from the last 20 years supports dropping traditional schizophrenia subtypes from DSM-5 and ICD-11
【24h】

Lack of use in the literature from the last 20 years supports dropping traditional schizophrenia subtypes from DSM-5 and ICD-11

机译:最近20年文献中缺乏使用支持从DSM-5和ICD-11中删除传统的精神分裂症亚型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The diagnoses of paranoia, catatonia, and hebephrenia preceded the use of dementia praecox and Bleuler's subsequent recognition of a heterogenous "Group of Schizophrenias." With some modification, traditional schizophrenia subtypes have been formalized for many years in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) classification systems. While widely used in the past, it is not clear that the schizophrenia subtypes remain in wide use or are influential in 21st-century research and clinical practice, and especially in the scientific literature. A review of published articles reveals over the last 20 years (1990, 2000, 2010) the use of traditional subtypes in the literature has fallen from 27.7% to 9.8% to 6.5%. Thus, by 2010, the use of subtypes in the leading literature venues declined to <10%. These facts strongly support DSM-5 and ICD-11 proposed elimination of traditional schizophrenia subtypes from a research and evolving knowledge perspective because traditional subtypes are simply no longer being used much in the scientific literature.
机译:妄想症,卡塔尼亚病和肝硬化的诊断先于使用老年痴呆症,随后布鲁勒认识到异质性“精神分裂症”。经过一些修改,传统的精神分裂症亚型在《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》(DSM)和《国际疾病分类》(ICD)分类系统中已被正规化多年。尽管在过去已被广泛使用,但尚不清楚精神分裂症亚型在21世纪的研究和临床实践中,尤其是在科学文献中是否仍被广泛使用或具有影响力。对已发表文章的回顾显示,在过去的20年中(1990年,2000年,2010年),文献中传统亚型的使用率从27.7%降至9.8%降至6.5%。因此,到2010年,主要文学场所的亚型使用率下降到<10%。这些事实强有力地支持了DSM-5和ICD-11提出的从研究和不断发展的知识角度消除传统精神分裂症亚型的提议,因为传统亚型在科学文献中已不再被广泛使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号