...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of public health >Do dimensions from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire predict vitality and mental health over and above the job strain and effort-reward imbalance models?
【24h】

Do dimensions from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire predict vitality and mental health over and above the job strain and effort-reward imbalance models?

机译:哥本哈根心理社会调查问卷的维度是否可以预测工作压力和工作量回报失衡模型之外的活力和心理健康?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims: The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) comprises dimensions (emotional demands, demands of hiding emotions, meaning of work, quality of leadership, and predictability) that are not in the job strain or the effort-reward imbalance (ERI) models. The study aim was to investigate whether these dimensions explain changes in vitality and mental health over and above the job strain and ERI models. Methods: A cohort of 3552 employees in 2000 were followed up in 2005 (cohort participation of 51%). Regression analyses were carried out with mental health and vitality as dependent variables. A significance level of 0.01 was applied when comparing regression models. Results: Regarding mental health, both the full COPSOQ-ERI model (p = 0.005) and the full job strain-COPSOQ model (p = 0.01) were significantly better than the ERI and the job strain models. Regarding vitality, none of the full COPSOQ models (i.e. with new COPSOQ dimensions together with job strain or ERI respectively) was significantly better than the ERI (p = 0.03) or the job strain (p = 0.04) models. Emotional demands and low meaning of work predicted poor mental health and low vitality. Conclusions: In relation to mental health, new psychosocial risk factors have the potential to add to the predictive power of the job strain and ERI models. The current practice of including only items from the ERI and job strain models in public health studies should be reconsidered. Theories regarding the status of, for example, emotional demands and meaning of work should be developed and tested.
机译:目标:哥本哈根心理社会调查问卷(COPSOQ)包括不在工作压力或努力回报不平衡(ERI)模型中的维度(情感需求,隐藏情绪的需求,工作含义,领导能力和可预测性)。该研究的目的是调查这些维度是否能解释工作压力和ERI模型之外的活力和心理健康变化。方法:2000年对3552名员工进行了随访,2005年进行了随访(队列参与率为51%)。进行回归分析,以心理健康和活力为因变量。比较回归模型时,显着性水平为0.01。结果:关于心理健康,完整的COPSOQ-ERI模型(p = 0.005)和完整的工作压力-COPSOQ模型(p = 0.01)均显着优于ERI和工作压力模型。关于生命力,没有一个完整的COPSOQ模型(即分别具有新的COPSOQ尺寸以及工作压力或ERI)明显优于ERI(p = 0.03)或工作压力(p = 0.04)模型。情绪要求和工作意义低下预示着不良的心理健康和低下的活力。结论:关于心理健康,新的社会心理风险因素有可能增加工作压力和ERI模型的预测能力。应该重新考虑目前仅将ERI和工作压力模型中的项目包括在公共卫生研究中的做法。应该发展和检验有关例如情感需求和工作意义的状态的理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号