首页> 外文期刊>Seismological research letters >Reply to 'Comment on 'Thirty Years of Confusion around 'Scattering Q'?'' by J. Xie and M. Fehler
【24h】

Reply to 'Comment on 'Thirty Years of Confusion around 'Scattering Q'?'' by J. Xie and M. Fehler

机译:J. Xie和M. Fehler对“关于'散射Q'的三十年混乱的评论?”的评论”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the preceding commentary, Xie and Fehler (2009) correctly identified the main points of my recent critique (Morozov 2009; hereafter M09) of widespread use of frequency-dependent Q in seismology, which were: 1) the faith in the existence of geometrical spreading (GS) corrections that are accurate enough to allow “good measurements” of attenuation; and 2)confidence in pervasive frequency dependence of Q within the Earth. Most of their arguments were answered in the more detailed paper (Morozov 2008; hereafter M08), in which the model and GS measurements were described. Unfortunately,Xie and Fehler did not mention this paper; therefore I will summarize the main points of M08 and M09 again here.
机译:在前面的评论中,谢和费勒(2009)正确地指出了我最近对地震学中频率依赖的Q的广泛使用的批判(Morozov 2009;此后的M09)的要点:1)对几何学存在的信念足够精确的扩频(GS)校正,可以对衰减进行“良好的测量”; 2)对地球内部普遍存在的Q频率依赖性的信心。他们的大多数论据在更详细的论文中得到了回答(Morozov 2008;此后为M08),其中描述了模型和GS测量。不幸的是,谢和费勒没有提到这篇论文。因此,我将在这里再次总结M08和M09的要点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号