...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >'Emotional rights', moral reasoning, and Jewish-Arab alliances in the regulation of in-vitro-fertilization in Israel: Theorizing the unexpected consequences of assisted reproductive technologies
【24h】

'Emotional rights', moral reasoning, and Jewish-Arab alliances in the regulation of in-vitro-fertilization in Israel: Theorizing the unexpected consequences of assisted reproductive technologies

机译：以色列体外受精管理中的“情感权利”，道德推理和犹太阿拉伯联盟：理论上辅助生殖技术的意外后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Consumption rates of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) in Israel is internationally unprecedented, a phenomenon that has been the subject of growing anthropological and sociological attention. Explanations for the singular extent of ARTs use in Israel tend to pre-assume and conceptually prioritize the symbolic and political power of pro-natalist discourses, Jewish religious values, and the demographic interests of the Jewish state. This article attempts to understand the exceptional usage of IVF in Israel in terms of its emergent meanings and unexpected effects in a particular local setup. The question that this article tries to answer is: How is the 'Israeli character' of IVF emerges within and through the interactive practice of moral justifications, and how might this medical technology affect the networks within which it is enmeshed? The article is based on a case-study analysis of a public dispute that took place in 2003-2004 over the extent of public funding for fertility treatments. Ethnographic analysis of parliament discussions, media coverage, and an online forum of IVF consumers recorded three frames of justification for the uniquely generous public funding scheme of IVF in Israel: 'rational-economic', 'nationalist', and 'liberal'. The latter assumes shared 'emotional vulnerability' of all 'childless' Israelis, Jews and Arabs alike and advocates a universal language of 'emotional rights' and 'human rights'. This liberal framing of IVF, which is the most persuasive justification in the dispute, blurs dichotomous rivalries between Jews and Arabs and generates a potential for alliances between traditionally rival sectors. These are some of the unexpected and non-intuitive consequences of ARTs in Israel.
机译：以色列辅助生殖技术（ART）的消费率在国际上是空前的，这一现象已成为人类学和社会学日益关注的主题。对以色列使用ART的单一范围的解释倾向于预先假定，并在概念上优先考虑亲日主义言论，犹太宗教价值观和犹太国家的人口利益的象征和政治力量。本文试图从IVF在以色列的特殊用法（在特定的本地环境中出现的含义和意想不到的效果）来理解。本文试图回答的问题是：IVF的“以色列特征”如何在道德辩护的互动实践中并通过其互动出现，以及这种医疗技术如何影响它所融入的网络？本文基于对2003年至2004年发生的关于公共治疗生育问题公共资金范围的公共争议的案例研究分析。对议会讨论的民族志分析，媒体报道以及试管婴儿消费者在线论坛记录了以色列试管婴儿独特慷慨的公共资助计划的三个理由框架：“理性经济”，“民族主义”和“自由主义”。后者假定所有“无子女”的以色列人，犹太人和阿拉伯人都有共同的“情感脆弱性”，并提倡“情感权利”和“人权”的通用语言。 IVF的自由框架是争端中最有说服力的理由，它模糊了犹太人和阿拉伯人之间一分为二的竞争，并为传统竞争领域之间的联盟创造了潜力。这些是ART在以色列产生的一些意料之外和非直觉的后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号