• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sociology of health & illness >Negotiating the contested terrain of narrative methods in illness contexts.
【24h】

Negotiating the contested terrain of narrative methods in illness contexts.

机译：在疾病背景下谈判叙事方法的争议领域。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper offers an interpretive account of an ongoing transatlantic debate about illness narratives instigated by the publication in 1997 of Paul Atkinson's paper Narrative Turn Or Blind Alley? The claims and counter-claims to be found in this debate about narrative data and narrative analysis are set out sequentially, in an attempt to grasp the debate's essentials. Matters of theoretical perspective, methodology, ethics, and personal politics are found to be at stake in the writings of the four featured academics: Paul Atkinson, Arthur Bochner, Arthur Frank and Elliot Mishler. The paper moves on to consider the types of sociologies at work in their arguments, and explores the debate's implications for the author's own illness narratives research project. The paper's overall aim is to assist researchers who seek to clarify their own thinking on the use of narrative research methods in illness contexts.
机译：本文提供了解释性的解释，说明了由Paul Atkinson在1997年发表的论文《叙事转向拐弯还是瞎了吗？在这场关于叙事数据和叙事分析的辩论中可以找到的主张和反主张是相继提出的，以试图掌握辩论的本质。在以下四位著名学者的著作中，理论观点，方法论，伦理学和个人政治问题受到威胁：保罗·阿特金森，亚瑟·博克纳，亚瑟·弗兰克和艾略特·米斯勒。论文继续以他们的论点来考虑工作中的社会学类型，并探讨了这场辩论对作者自己的疾病叙事研究项目的影响。该论文的总体目标是协助寻求阐明自己在疾病背景下使用叙事研究方法的研究者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号