...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Advocacy Coalition Resources and Strategies in Colorado Hydraulic Fracturing Politics
【24h】

Advocacy Coalition Resources and Strategies in Colorado Hydraulic Fracturing Politics

机译：科罗拉多州水力压裂政治的倡导联盟资源和战略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article examines how members of competing coalitions seek to influence public policy. Past research examined coalitions and policy change, but offered limited understanding about the relationships between coalitions' resources, strategies, and policy change. The case study focuses on the establishment of various regulations related to hydraulic fracturing in Colorado. Data were collected using interviews (n=14) and a survey (n=137) of policy actors asking about their beliefs, resources, and strategies in April 2013. This study found that members of the coalition proposing stricter regulations were successful. This winning coalition more frequently engaged in a wider range of strategies and had greater public support compared to their opponents. The study also found that among the winning coalition members, leadership and information technology resources were associated with the majority of their strategies, but financial resources did not have a significant relationship with any strategy.
机译：本文探讨了竞争联盟的成员如何寻求影响公共政策。过去的研究检查了联盟和政策变化，但是对联盟资源，战略和政策变化之间关系的了解有限。该案例研究的重点是建立与科罗拉多州水力压裂有关的各种法规。 2013年4月，通过访谈（n = 14）和对政策参与者进行调查（n = 137）收集了数据，询问了他们的信念，资源和策略。这项研究发现，提出更严格规定的联盟成员是成功的。与对手相比，这个获胜的联盟更频繁地参与更广泛的战略，并获得了更多的公众支持。该研究还发现，在获胜的联盟成员中，领导力和信息技术资源与他们的大多数战略有关，但是财务资源与任何战略都没有显着关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号