• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric physical therapy: the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association >Knowledge Translation of the Gross Motor Function Classification System Among Pediatric Physical Therapists
【24h】

Knowledge Translation of the Gross Motor Function Classification System Among Pediatric Physical Therapists

机译：小儿理疗师运动功能总分类系统的知识翻译

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose: To learn where pediatric physical therapists in the United States are in the process of knowledge translation of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). Methods: Links to an online survey were distributed electronically. Results: All 283 respondents reported hearing about the GMFCS, 95% agreed it was useful, 81% reported they were confident in their ability to use it, 77% reported they use it, and 42% reported they use it consistently. Therapists primarily used the GMFCS to predict gross motor function, set realistic goals, and anticipate need for assistive technology. The American Physical Therapy Association Section on Pediatrics members were more likely than nonmembers to agree the GMFCS is useful, they are able to use it, that they use it, and that they use it consistently. Conclusions: The majority of therapists responding use the GMFCS, but not consistently. Video Abstract: For more insights from the authors, see Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at http://links.lww.com/PPT/A91.
机译：目的：了解美国儿科物理治疗师在进行大运动功能分类系统（GMFCS）知识翻译的过程中所处的位置。方法：以电子方式分发与在线调查的链接。结果：全部283位受访者报告说听说过GMFCS，95％同意使用GMFCS，81％报告他们对使用它的能力充满信心，77％报告他们使用了GMFCS，42％报告他们一直使用GMFCS。治疗师主要使用GMFCS预测总体运动功能，设定切合实际的目标，并预测对辅助技术的需求。美国小儿医学理疗协会分会的会员比非会员更有可能同意GMFCS是有用的，他们可以使用它，可以使用它，并且可以一致地使用它。结论：大多数对治疗有反应的治疗师使用GMFCS，但并不一致。视频摘要：有关作者的更多见解，请参阅补充数字内容1，网址为http://links.lww.com/PPT/A91。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号