Stakeholders debate nano safety questions at European hearing

Pesticide amp; Toxic Chemical News Group

首页> 外文期刊>Pesticide(s) & Toxic Chemical News >Stakeholders debate nano safety questions at European hearing

【24h】

Stakeholders debate nano safety questions at European hearing

机译：利益相关者在欧洲听证会上辩论纳米安全性问题

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Various stakeholders discussed the issue of nanotechnology safety at a Sept. 10 European hearing, which focused on the recent opinion on the risk assessment of nanomaterials by the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR).

机译：在9月10日的欧洲听证会上，众多利益相关者讨论了纳米技术的安全问题，该听证会的重点是欧洲委员会新兴和新发现健康风险科学委员会（SCENIHR）对纳米材料的风险评估的最新观点。

著录项

来源
《Pesticide(s) & Toxic Chemical News》 |2009年第45期|共2页
作者
Pesticide amp; Toxic Chemical News Group;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类农药防治（化学防治）;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Stakeholders debate nano safety questions at European hearing [J] . Pesticide amp, Toxic Chemical News Group Pesticide(s) & Toxic Chemical News . 2009,第45期

机译：利益相关者在欧洲听证会上辩论纳米安全性问题
2. Revised Guidance on Genetically Engineered Animals; First “Biopharm” Product Approved by FDA; House Introduces Bill on Safety of Nanotechnology; Cloned Animals Safe to Eat, Japan Finds; Europe Still Debating Safety of Genetically Modified Plants; Risk to U.S. Food Supply from Foreign Genetically Engineered Crops Seen; Update on Dissemination of Genetically Engineered Crops [J] . Biotechnology Law Report . 2009,第2期

机译：经修订的《转基因动物指南》； FDA批准的首个“ Biopharm”产品；众议院提出《纳米技术安全法案》；日本发现可以安全食用的克隆动物欧洲仍在辩论转基因植物的安全性；国外基因工程作物对美国食品供应的风险；基因工程作物的传播最新情况
3. European Commission opens nano debate ahead of hearing [J] . Pesticide amp, Toxic Chemical News Group Pesticide(s) & Toxic Chemical News . 2009,第25期

机译：欧盟委员会在听证会之前展开纳米辩论
4. Food safety and knowledge transfer in Europe – a challenge for all stakeholders [C] . Susanne Braun, Klaus Hadwiger International congress on engineering and food . 2011

机译：欧洲的食品安全和知识转移 - 对所有利益相关者的挑战
5. The Celtic fringe and European integration: Sovereignty, nationalism, and the European Communities debate in Scotland and Ireland, 1961--1975. [D] . Devenney, Andrew D. 2007

机译：凯尔特边缘与欧洲一体化：主权，民族主义以及1961--1975年在苏格兰和爱尔兰的欧洲共同体辩论。
6. Bioeconomy perception by future stakeholders: Hearing from European forestry students [O] . Mauro Masiero, Laura Secco, Davide Pettenella, 2020

机译：未来利益相关者的生物经济感知：欧洲林业学生的听证会
7. Oral Question (0-88/83) with debate pursuant to Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure by Mr. Bord, on behalf of the Group of European Progressive Democrats to the Commission of European Communities. Subject: Centralized processing of the June 1984 election results in Strasbourg. Does the Commission not consider that Strasbourg's importanceas the capital of Europe and the fact that it is associatedwith the European Parliament in the minds of Community citizens would make it an appropriate centre for the processing of the results of the European elections on 14-17 June 1984? Working Documents 1983-1984, Doc. 1-825/83, 10 October 1983 [O] . 1983

机译：口头问题（0-88 / 83），Bord先生代表欧洲共同体委员会欧洲进步民主党集团根据“议事规则”第42条进行辩论。主题：斯特拉斯堡1984年6月选举结果的集中处理。委员会不认为斯特拉斯堡的重要性作为欧洲的首都及其相关的事实欧洲议会在社区公民的心目中是否会成为处理1984年6月14日至17日欧洲选举结果的适当中心？工作文件1983-1984，Doc。 1983年10月10日第1-825 / 83号

Stakeholders debate nano safety questions at European hearing

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅