Review board recommends changes to Responsible Care

Pesticide amp; Toxic Chemical News Group

首页> 外文期刊>Pesticide(s) & Toxic Chemical News >Review board recommends changes to Responsible Care

【24h】

Review board recommends changes to Responsible Care

机译：审核委员会建议更改责任关怀

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

An eight-member external strategic review board(SRB)has recommended eight major changes to the chemical industry's Responsible Care program,in a report issued earlier this month.Members of ACC's Board Committee on Responsible Care discussed their initial reactions to the report Oct.24.

机译：一个由八名成员组成的外部战略审查委员会（SRB）在本月初发布的一份报告中建议对化学工业的责任关怀计划进行八项重大更改.ACC责任关怀委员会成员讨论了他们对该报告的初步反应10月24日。

著录项

来源
《Pesticide(s) & Toxic Chemical News》 |2006年第2期|共2页
作者
Pesticide amp; Toxic Chemical News Group;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类农药工业;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Review board recommends changes to Responsible Care [J] . Pesticide amp, Toxic Chemical News Group Pesticide(s) & Toxic Chemical News . 2006,第2期

机译：审核委员会建议更改责任关怀
2. Responsible Care in India: Time to step up efforts to bring more on board [J] . Ravi Raghavan Chemical Weekly . 2012,第12期

机译：印度的责任关怀：是时候加倍努力，为更多人服务
3. Pay Review Body report recommends across the board 1 % pay increase [J] . Podiatry Now . 2014,第5期

机译：薪酬审查机构报告建议全面提高1％的薪酬
4. What are "safety critical functions" in an intelligent building? Who cares? Who is responsible? What are the risks? [C] . Bowell M. Intelligent Building Environments, 2005. The IEE Seminar on (Ref. No. 2005/11059) . 2005

机译：智能建筑中的“安全关键功能”是什么？谁在乎？谁是负责的人？有什么风险？
5. Sentiment Features for Yelp Not-recommended Online Reviews Study [D] . Li, Na. 2018

机译：Yelp的情感功能不推荐在线评论研究
6. A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists Genomic Researchers and Institutional Review Board Chairs [O] . Debra S. Brandt, Laura Shinkunas, Stephen L. Hillis, -1

机译：仔细研究公开遗传结果的推荐标准：医学遗传专家基因组研究人员和机构审查委员会主席的观点
7. The Framingham Offspring Study: a commentary1150th AnniversaryHistorical ArticleINTRODUCTIONIn this edition of the Journal, we release the fifth in a series of reviews of influential articles that have been previously published in ACC journals, including the American Journal of Cardiology(from 1958 to 1982) and JACC(from 1983 to the present). The publication of these articles is only one aspect of the ACC’s 50th anniversary commemoration, which highlights 50 years of leadership in cardiovascular care and education. The articles are intended to encourage reflection on the remarkable progress made in cardiovascular medicine over time, as well as to acknowledge the amazing prescience of some early investigators in anticipating and, in many cases, later guiding developments in their field.The working group responsible for selecting these articles and asking reviewers to write editorials solicited suggestions from the ACC’s clinical committees and individual members.The group achieved consensus fairly easily, including whom the group should ask to prepare the accompanying editorials. We initially drew up a list of 14 general areas to cover in this series, but later found that there are several major areas of modern cardiology, prominently molecular cardiology, in which the truly landmark articles have, alas, not yet been published in JACC. Therefore, the working group decided not to categorize by subject, but instead, to concentrate on the most important articles.The working group, a task force of the Subcommittee for the Commemoration of the ACC 50th Anniversary, owes a great deal to Ms. May A. Roustom and the efficient and tireless staff at Heart House for facilitating this project. We also wish to thank all who suggested articles and, most important, the authors who prepared reviews for their willingness to contribute their time and wisdom.Influential Articles in JACC Working GroupSharon A. Hunt, M.D., F.A.C.C.Rick A. Nishimura, M.D., F.A.C.C.H.J.C. Swan, M.D., Ph.D., M.A.C.C.Michael J. Wolk, M.D., F.A.C.C. [O] . Swan H.J.C 1999

机译：弗雷明汉后代研究：1150周年历史文章引言在本期杂志中，我们发布了一系列有影响力的文章的第五篇评论，这些评论先前已在ACC期刊上发表，包括《美国心脏病学杂志》（1958年至1982年）和《美国心脏病学会杂志》（从1983年至今）。这些文章的发表只是ACC成立50周年纪念的一个方面，该纪念日着重介绍了心血管护理和教育领域50年的领导地位。这些文章旨在鼓励人们对心血管医学随着时间的推移所取得的显着进展进行反思，并承认一些早期研究人员在预见并在许多情况下为他们领域的发展提供指导的惊人先见之明。选择这些文章并要求审稿人撰写社论，征求ACC临床委员会和个人成员的建议。该小组相当容易达成共识，包括该小组应要求谁准备随附的社论。我们最初拟出了本系列文章涵盖的14个常规领域的清单，但后来发现现代心脏病学有几个主要领域，主要是分子心脏病学，可惜的是，真正的具有里程碑意义的文章尚未在JACC上发表。因此，工作组决定不按主题进行分类，而是专注于最重要的文章。工作组是ACC成立50周年纪念小组委员会的一个工作组，在很大程度上要归功于梅女士。 A. Roustom和Heart House高效而孜孜不倦的员工为该项目提供了便利。我们还要感谢所有提出建议的文章，最重要的是感谢准备撰写评论以贡献自己的时间和智慧的作者.JACC工作组的有影响力的文章Sharon A. Swan，M.D.，Ph.D.，M.A.C.C. Michael J.Wolk，M.D.，F.A.C.C.
8. Board and Care for Elderly and Mentally Disabled Populations. Volume 4. A Review of the Literature [R] . Sherwood, C. C., Seltzer, M. M. 1983

机译：老年人和弱智人群的董事会和照顾。第4卷。文献综述

Review board recommends changes to Responsible Care

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅