• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Analytical Comparison of Three Visual Approach Slope Indicators: VASIS, T-VASIS and PAPI
【24h】

Analytical Comparison of Three Visual Approach Slope Indicators: VASIS, T-VASIS and PAPI

机译：三种视觉坡度指标的分析比较：VasIs，T-VasIs和papI

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This report compares the three Visual Approach Slope Indicators (VASIs), (Red-White) VASIS, T-VASIS and PAPI (Precision Approach Path Indicator) approved by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) for use by turbojet aeroplanes. The discussion is based upon published performance data including approach path measurements and pilot opinion, ergonomics and the ability to fulfil operational requirements. It is concluded from flight trial data and operational experience that T-VASIS is a more precise and sensitive aid than Red-White VASIS which has several deficiencies known for many years. The current policy of not using Red-White VASIS for routine operations in Australia is supported by the conclusions of this report. It is predicted that PAPI also will be less satisfactory than T-VASIS. This prediction is based mainly on ergonomic principles. Performance data about PAPI is limited and consists mainly of relatively uninformative pilot acceptance surveys. Because insufficient objective parameters describing trajectories of aircraft from the intended user-population have been published, most of the claims for PAPI superiority remain unsubstantiated. Accordingly, it is recommended that PAPI be evaluated using objective measures in a controlled experimental environment with transport aircraft. Further, because of its ergonomic deficiencies, PAPI should not be installed in Australia for routine operational use by turbojet aeroplanes at this stage.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号