• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >New Challenges for European Comparative Law:The Judicial Reception of EU Non-Discrimination Law and a turn to a Multi-layered Culturally-informed Comparative Law Method for a better Understanding of the EU Harmonization
【2h】

New Challenges for European Comparative Law:The Judicial Reception of EU Non-Discrimination Law and a turn to a Multi-layered Culturally-informed Comparative Law Method for a better Understanding of the EU Harmonization

机译：欧洲比较法面临的新挑战：欧盟非歧视法的司法接受以及转向以文化为依据的多层次比较法，以更好地理解欧盟和谐

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article argues that comparative law needs to explore its critical potential when engaging with the European harmonization process and its effects on the law of the Member States, particularly, in politically contentious areas such as EU non-discrimination law. In the first part, the article evaluates existing comparative law methods and their suitability to identify legal and cultural factors that influence the judicial reception of EU harmonized law on a national level. Using EU non-discrimination law as a case study, it questions to what extent traditional methods are suitable to explain differences in the national judicial reception of EU harmonized law, despite the exclusive competence of the Court of Justice of the European Union to interpret EU law. In doing so, it considers the potential of critical comparative law for the development of a deeper understanding of the national courts’ reception of EU harmonized law as a key part of the broader legal harmonization process. In the second part, the article develops an original multi-layered culturally informed method to compare EU harmonized law. The proposal goes beyond the existing methods of comparative law by including critical aspects and stressing the relevance of embedding a general normative framework in any comparative critique. It challenges comparatists to reach deeply into national cultural spheres and to identify key influences on the application of EU rules and EU-national legal ‘hybrids’. The method creates room for multi-layered narratives of comparison aimed at gaining a deeper understanding of the national legal and non-legal cultural background that can hinder or facilitate harmonization processes. This enriched comparative critique can offer new insights into the process of legal harmonization in the EU, particularly by focusing on the point of application rather than the previous phases of creation of EU law and its reception by Member States.
机译：本文认为，比较法在参与欧洲统一进程及其对成员国法律的影响时，特别是在诸如欧盟非歧视法等具有政治争议的领域中，需要探索其关键潜力。在第一部分中，本文评估了现有的比较法方法及其适用性，以确定在国家层面上影响欧盟统一法律司法接受的法律和文化因素。尽管欧盟法院拥有解释欧盟法律的专有权，但以欧盟非歧视法为例，它质疑传统方法在何种程度上适合解释欧盟统一法律在国家司法接受方面的差异。 。在此过程中，它认为重要的比较法对于进一步理解国家法院对欧盟统一法的接受的潜力，这是更广泛的法律统一程序的关键部分。在第二部分中，本文提出了一种原始的多层文化知情方法，用于比较欧盟统一法。该提案超越了现有的比较法方法，包括了关键方面，并强调了将一般性规范框架嵌入任何比较批评中的重要性。它挑战比较主义者深入国家文化领域，并确定对实施欧盟规则和欧盟国家法律“混合动力”的关键影响。该方法为多层比较叙事创造了空间，目的是加深对可能阻碍或促进协调进程的国家法律和非法律文化背景的了解。这种丰富的比较性批评可以为欧盟的法律统一过程提供新的见解，尤其是通过侧重于应用的角度，而不是欧盟法律的创建和成员国接受欧盟法律的先前阶段。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mulder Jule;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号