首页> 外文OA文献 >Commentary on: Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research : Can the emerging domain of behavioral addictions bring a new reflection for the fieldudof addictions, by stressing the issue of the context of addiction development?
【2h】

Commentary on: Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research : Can the emerging domain of behavioral addictions bring a new reflection for the fieldudof addictions, by stressing the issue of the context of addiction development?

机译:评论:我们在日常生活中是否过度致病?行为成瘾研究的可行蓝图:行为成瘾的新兴领域能否为该领域带来新的反思 ud通过强调成瘾发展的背景问题来解决成瘾问题?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ud Background udThis paper is a commentary to the article entitled: “Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research”, by Billieux, Schimmenti, Khazaal, Maurage and Heeren (2015).ududud Methods and Aims udIn this manuscript, we commented on two aspects developed by the authors. Billieux et al. (2015) propose that the recent development of propositions of behavioral addiction is driven by an unwise application of an addiction model to excessive behaviors and rests on a confirmatory research strategy that does not question the psychological processes underlying the development of the conduct. They also show that applying a process driven strategy leads to a more appropriate description of the reality of the behavior and conduct, in particular by describing a variety of motivations for the excessive behavior, which is central to understanding the nature of the conduct. We believe that this new approach, which is fruitful to the emerging domain of behavioral addictions, could also apply to the domain of addictions in general. The latter is characterized by the application of a generic biological model, largely influenced by animal models, focusing on neurophysiological determinants of addiction. This approach may have decreased the attention paid to dimensions of addictions that are more specifically human. We will firstly briefly argue on the limitation of this neurophysiological addiction model for the field of excessive behavioral conducts. Secondly, we will argue for an approach centered on the differentiation of motivations and on the adaptive dimension of the behavior when it first developed and on the evocation of a transition where the conduct became independent of its original function.ududud Conclusions udThe emerging domain of behavioral addictions, where no animal model has been developed so far, may bring a new reflection that may apply to the domain of addictions in general, with a specific attention to human questions.udud
机译:ud背景 ud本文是对标题为“我们是否过度日常生活的过度使用? Billieux,Schimmenti,Khazaal,Maurage和Heeren(2015)撰写的关于行为成瘾研究的可行蓝图。 ud ud ud方法和目的 ud在本文中,我们对作者提出的两个方面进行了评论。 Billieux等。 (2015)提出行为成瘾的主张的最新发展是由对过度行为的成瘾模型的不明智应用所驱动的,并且建立在一种验证性研究策略上,该策略对行为发展的心理过程没有质疑。他们还表明,应用过程驱动策略可以更恰当地描述行为和行为的实际情况,特别是通过描述过度行为的各种动机,这对于理解行为的本质至关重要。我们认为,这种新方法有益于新兴的行为成瘾领域,也可以普遍应用于成瘾领域。后者的特点是应用受生物学模型影响较大的通用生物学模型,其重点是成瘾的神经生理学决定因素。这种方法可能减少了人们对成瘾问题的关注,这些成瘾问题更具体地是人类。首先,我们将简要讨论这种神经生理成瘾模型在过度行为行为领域的局限性。其次,我们将主张一种方法,该方法应围绕动机的差异以及行为在其最初发展时的适应性维度以及在行为独立于其原始功能的过渡的激发上进行。 ud ud ud结论 ud行为成瘾的新兴领域(到目前为止尚未开发动物模型)可能会带来新的反思,这种现象可能适用于一般的成瘾领域,尤其关注人类问题。 ud ud

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号