• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >The legitimising processes of a new regulator: the case of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profit Commission
【2h】

The legitimising processes of a new regulator: the case of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profit Commission

机译：新监管机构的合法化流程：以澳大利亚慈善与非营利委员会为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

PurposeudThis paper strengthens our theoretical understanding of the processes through which a new regulator seeks to gain legitimacy within an existing regulatory space. We do this by investigating the case of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profit Commission (ACNC).ududDesign/methodology/approachudSynthesising legitimacy theory with the concept of regulatory space, we analyse formal public discourse surrounding the establishment and operations of the ACNC.ududFindingsudRegulation is essentially a context-bound political process in which a new regulator needs to establish legitimacy to ensure its survival. It must convince its constituents that it has developed processes to operate effectively and professionally in addressing constituents’ needs, to bargain authoritatively with other regulators in establishing its operational boundaries, and to engage politically with government and constituents. Over a relatively short time, the ACNC built legitimacy, despite the political threats to its formal regulatory authority.ududResearch limitations/implicationsudOur conclusions are based on our analysis of one case. There is scope for further investigations of the processes by which new regulators establish their legitimacy in different contexts.ududPractical implicationsudThe potential for a political threat to the authority of a new regulator, and the difficulty of achieving regulatory reform, particularly in a federated system such as Australia, highlight the necessity for a new regulator to develop a compelling discourse of legitimacy.ududOriginality/valueudWe synthesise regulatory space and legitimacy perspectives, contributing to an understanding of the processes of regulation.
机译：目的 ud本文加强了我们对新监管者寻求在现有监管空间中获得合法性的过程的理论理解。我们通过调查澳大利亚慈善和非营利委员会（ACNC）的案例来做到这一点。 ud udDesign / methodology / approach ud将合法性理论与监管空间的概念综合在一起，我们分析围绕机构和机构的正式公众话语 ud udFindings udRegulation本质上是一个与上下文相关的政治过程，在这个过程中，新的监管者需要建立合法性以确保其生存。它必须说服其选民，它已经制定了程序，可以有效，专业地满足选民的需求，与其他监管机构进行权威性讨价还价，以建立其业务范围，并与政府和选民进行政治互动。尽管有对其正式监管机构的政治威胁，ACNC仍在较短的时间内建立了合法性。 ud ud研究局限/含意 ud我们的结论基于我们对一个案例的分析。新监管者在不同背景下确立其合法性的过程还有进一步调查的余地。 ud ud实践意义 ud对新监管者的权力构成政治威胁的可能性以及实现监管改革的困难，特别是在像澳大利亚这样的联邦制国家，突显了新监管者发展具有吸引力的合法性论述的必要性。 ud ud原始性/价值 ud我们综合了监管空间和合法性观点，有助于理解监管过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号