首页> 外文OA文献 >Managing Uncertainty During Organization Design Decision-Making Processes: The Moderating Effects of Different Types of Uncertainty
【2h】

Managing Uncertainty During Organization Design Decision-Making Processes: The Moderating Effects of Different Types of Uncertainty

机译:在组织设计决策过程中管理不确定性:不同类型不确定性的调节作用

摘要

Uncertainty about one's job or work environment is a common and aversive experience that organizational members typically seek to reduce or manage. This study investigates whether different types of uncertainty - informational uncertainty (i.e., not having sufficient information to confidently form social judgments) and standing uncertainty (i.e., instability in one's perception of positive regard from relevant others) - are qualitatively distinct. The study also examines whether both types of uncertainty are heightened by ongoing organizational factors (i.e., organization role and tenure) as well as temporary factors (i.e., affiliation with a division undergoing redesign). Implementing fair processes and procedures may be an effective way for organizational leaders to help organizational members address their uncertainty. Uncertainty has been shown to moderate the "fair process effect," such that the positive effect of higher process fairness (i.e., procedural, informational, and interpersonal fairness) on organizational members' attitudes is stronger when uncertainty is higher. Specifically, people's uncertainty about their standing in an organization has been shown to moderate the "process-outcome interaction effect," such that the positive effect of the interaction between higher process fairness and lower outcome fairness on organizational members' attitudes is stronger when uncertainty is higher. This study investigates whether informational uncertainty, like standing uncertainty, moderates the fair process effect and the process-outcome interaction effect. Study hypotheses were tested through a longitudinal field research design that utilized web-based questionnaires involving responses from 500 students, faculty, and administrators of an urban university undergoing an organization redesign effort. Both ongoing and temporary organizational factors were found to significantly reduce rather than heighten uncertainty, which was the opposite of what was predicted. Higher informational and standing uncertainty were found to enhance the positive effect of process fairness on organizational members' attitudes as predicted. But lower informational and standing uncertainty were also found to enhance the positive effect of process fairness on organizational members' attitudes, which was the opposite of what was predicted. Lower informational uncertainty, but not standing uncertainty, was found to enhance the positive effect of higher process fairness and lower outcome favorability on organizational members' attitudes, which was the opposite of what was predicted.
机译:对工作或工作环境的不确定性是组织成员通常试图减少或管理的普遍厌恶的经历。这项研究调查了不同类型的不确定性-信息性不确定性(即没有足够的信息来自信地形成社会判断力)和持续性不确定性(即一个人对他人的积极尊重的不稳定性)在质量上是否存在差异。该研究还研究了不确定性是否会因持续的组织因素(即组织角色和任期)以及临时因素(即与正在重新设计的部门的隶属关系)而加剧。实施公平的流程和程序可能是组织领导者帮助组织成员解决不确定性的有效方法。事实证明,不确定性可以缓和“公平过程效应”,因此,当不确定性越高时,较高的过程公平性(即程序,信息和人际公平)对组织成员态度的积极作用就越强。具体来说,人们对自己在组织中的地位的不确定性已被证明可以缓和“过程—结果相互作用效应”,从而当不确定性为更高。这项研究调查了信息不确定性(例如站立不确定性)是否减轻了公平的过程效应和过程结果相互作用效应。研究假设通过纵向现场研究设计进行了检验,该设计利用基于网络的调查问卷,涉及来自正在进行组织重新设计工作的城市大学的500名学生,教职员工和管理人员的回答。发现正在进行的和临时的组织因素都会大大减少而不是增加不确定性,这与预期的相反。人们发现,较高的信息和常设不确定性可以增强过程公平性对组织成员态度的积极影响,正如预期的那样。但是,也发现较低的信息和常设不确定性可以增强过程公平性对组织成员态度的积极影响,这与预期的相反。发现较低的信息不确定性,而不是固定的不确定性,可以增强较高的过程公平性和较低的结果偏爱性对组织成员态度的积极影响,这与预期的相反。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mann Alice;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号