Autonomic group decision making using impedance scores

• 1. 使用补偿决策区域进行决策反馈均衡的方法和电路 [P] . 中国专利： CN111801628A . 2020-10-20
• 2. 使用合理人群数据对自主运载工具轨迹进行评分 [P] . 中国专利： CN114118658A . 2022-03-01
• 3. AUTONOMIC GROUP DECISION MAKING USING IMPEDANCE SCORES [P] . 美国专利： US2017154272A9 . 2017-06-01

  机译： 使用阻抗得分进行自主小组决策

• 4. AUTONOMIC GROUP DECISION MAKING USING IMPEDANCE SCORES [P] . 美国专利： US2015302308A1 . 2015-10-22

  机译： 使用阻抗得分进行自主小组决策

• 5. AUTONOMIC GROUP DECISION MAKING USING IMPEDANCE SCORES [P] . 美国专利： US2015302309A1 . 2015-10-22

  机译： 使用阻抗得分进行自主小组决策

• 1. Correlations between five-pattern personality scores from traditional Chinese medicine and autonomic nervous response indicators in healthy female college students [J] . Jiayuan Zhang, Tianfang Wang, Jian Du, 中医科学杂志（英文） . 2019,第002期
• 2. Correlations between five-pattern personality scores from traditional Chinese medicine and autonomic nervous response indicators in healthy female college students [J] . Jiayuan Zhang, Tianfang Wang, Jian Du, 中医科学杂志(英文) . 2019,第002期
• 3. Improvements to Female Autonomy and Household Decision-Making Power from an Intervention Targeting Improved Food Security: A Gender-Based Analysis of the Rajasthan Nutrition Project [J] . Lindsay M. Belvedere, Siena F. Davis, Bobbi L. Gray, 健康（英文） . 2021,第002期
• 4. Operationalizing Cultural Autonomy in International Law as a Form of Effective Participation in Decision-Making [J] . Janos Fiala-Butora 国际关系与外交：英文版 . 2019,第010期
• 5. Women’s autonomy in health decision-making and its effect on access to family planning services in Senegal in 2017: a propensity score analysis [J] . N. M. Sougou, O. Bassoum, A. Faye, BMC Public Health . 2020,第1期
• 6. Combination of Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 and Heart Rate Variability for Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy in People with Type 2 Diabetes [J] . Zhiyin Zhang, Yujin Ma, Liujun Fu, International Journal of Experimental Diabetes Research: Experimental Diabesity Research . 2020,第1期
• 7. Combination of Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 and Heart Rate Variability for Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy in People with Type 2 Diabetes [J] . Zhiyin Zhang, Yujin Ma, Liujun Fu, Journal of diabetes research. . 2020,第2期
• 8. Ethical Decision Making in Robots: Autonomy, Trust and Responsibility Autonomy Trust and Responsibility [C] . Fahad Alaieri, Andre Vellino International conference on social robotics . 2016
• 9. A Latent Change Score Approach to Understanding Autonomic Coordination [D] . Rudd, Kristen L. 2019
• 10. Women’s autonomy in health decision-making and its effect on access to family planning services in Senegal in 2017: a propensity score analysis [O] . N. M. Sougou, O. Bassoum, A. Faye, 2020
• 11. Decision-making is the process of analyzing information about a problem situation and comparing it to a specific conclusion in order to solve a specific problematic (Yıkılmaz, 2001; Miller and Byrnes, 2001). Decision-making styles are a mechanism that is influenced by the internal and external conditions that determine the direction of the decisions of the individual, the content of the decision-making process, and the outcome of the decision-making process (Payne, Bettman and Johson, 1993; Bavol’ár and Orosová, 2015). ACT is a contemporary member of the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy family. ACT (Acceptance and commitment therapy) has both similar and different directions with Behavioral Therapies and Cognitive Therapies (Herbet and Forman, 2011; Hayes, 2004). KKT responds to classical behavioral treatments using both existential and cognitive approaches in the analysis of behavior. KKT is a science wing that tries to solve human problems with a wider perspective aimed at solving problematic human behaviors (Plumb, Stewart, Dahl and Lundgren, 2009). It is seen that there is very little research about the new approach of ACT approach when the aiming country of our country is screened and it is thought that our country will contribute to the field of psychological counseling with the work done. In the scope of the research, experimental and control groups and preliminary test, post-test and follow-up measurements of 2x3 experimental design were used. The study's study group consists of a total of 24 (12 experimental and 12 control groups) university students studying in different departments and levels, continuing their education in the academic year of 2015-2016 in Ağrı province and İbrahim Chechen University in 2015-2016 academic year. The average age of participants in the experiment and control group is 20. There were 12 participants in the experimental group, 7 female and 5 male, and 12 participants, 7 female and 5 male in the control group. Personal Information Form and Decision Making Style Scale prepared by the researcher were used in the research. In order to decide on the tests to be used in the course of analyzing the data, the scores of the participant's Decision Styles Scale pre-test, which are placed primarily in the experimental and control groups, it was analyzed whether the basic expectations of parametric tests were answered. As a result of the analysis made, the scores, skewness and kurtosis coefficients obtained from the Decision Making Styles Scale were given to the experimental and control groups. It was determined that the distribution was normal in the result of Shapiro-Wilk test, in which the skewness and kurtosis coefficients of each sub-scale were ranked between -1 and +1. Participants in the experimental and control groups; homogeneity test results for decision-style pre-test measurements indicate that the data are homogeneous. According to the results of the Mauchly Globalness Test, it has been determined that working supports the hypothesis. It was determined that there was no significant difference between the pre-test scores obtained from dependent decision-making style of experiment and control groups, but the test group showed lower mean scores at the significant level within the scores of post-test and follow-up tests. Therefore, it can be said that the ACT-oriented psychoeducation program applied to the experimental group reduces the dependent decision-making style scores from the decision style sub-dimensions and the psychoeducation program has a lasting effect. It was determined that there was no significant difference between pre-test, post-test and follow-up scores obtained from the Spontaneous-Instant Decision Style of experiment and control groups. Thus, it can be said that this situation does not cause a significant difference in the Spontaneous-Decision-Making Style scores from the decision style sub-dimensions of the ACT-oriented psychoeducation program applied to the experimental group. The ACT -oriented psychoeducation program had a decline in the intuitive decision-making styles of the individuals, but this decrease did not create significant differences. Thus, it can be said that this situation does not make a meaningful difference in the intuitive decision style scores from the decision style sub-dimensions of the KKT oriented psychoeducation program applied to the experimental group. The pre-test scores obtained from the rational decision-making style of the experimental and control groups showed that there was a difference between the post-test and the follow-up scores, but this difference was not significant. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the test group had higher levels of rational decision style than the pre - test scores in the post test and follow - up scores, whereas the post test and follow - up test scores in the control group rational decision style showed a decrease compared to the pre - test scores. the pre - test scores. Decision-making Styles Scale Avoidant Decision Making As a result of the analysis of the mean scores of the subscale scores of pre-test, post-test and follow-up measures, the group effect was found to be insignificant. It was determined that the experimental and control groups differed significantly from the pre-test scores obtained from the avoidant decision-making style but did not show any significant change within the scores of the post-test and follow-up tests. [O] . mustafa ercengiz, ali haydar şar 2018
• 12. RESPONSE SPECIFICITY FOR DIFFERENCE SCORES AND AUTONOMIC LABILITY SCORES [R] . LAVERNE C. JOHNSON, DAVID J. HORD, ARDIE LUBIN 1963

• 1. Patient’s Perception of Autonomy Support and Shared Decision Making in Physical Therapy [J] . Ignaas Devisch ,Katreine Dierckx ,Dominique Vandevelde . 预防医学期刊（英文） . 2015,第9期
• 2. 使用决策树从中医证候量表评分判断缺血性中风神经功能缺损程度 [C] . 张华 . 2008中华中医药学会内科分会中医内科学科建设研讨会 . 2008
• 3. 团队如何进行伦理决策：基于社会决策图式理论的实证研究 [A] . 季浩 . 2014