• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>2008 3rd International Conference on Intelligent System and Knowledge Engineering(第三届智能系统与知识工程国际会议)(ISKE 2008)论文集 >Soft Sciences versus Crisp Sciences:a look into the future of Science
【24h】

Soft Sciences versus Crisp Sciences:a look into the future of Science

机译：软科学与脆科学：对科学未来的展望

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this paper we pretend to open a discussion on theneed of alternative approaches to Western Sciences,pointing out some of the restrictive consequences ofthe Aristotelian logic Western Sciences assume in theirdeeper roots.In particular,we stress that meanwhilesome logic is needed in order to check consistenciesand inconsistencies,the past practical uniqueness ofsuch a logic imposed that experiments and informationhad to be modeled,as the only consistent possibility,the way they are described in Probability Theory.Inthese terms it is easy to understand that all thoseSocial Sciences that deal with linguistic informationwill never fully fit key Western scientific requirements.But perhaps an alternative Science can be consistentlyconstructed from a non-binary logic,allowing the term"soft" Sciences to become proper,in opposition to"hard" Sciences,that should since then be called"crisp" Sciences.
机译：在本文中，我们假装开展关于西方科学替代方法的讨论，指出亚里士多德逻辑西方科学在他们的世代州的一些限制性后果。特别的情况，我们强调了意味着需要逻辑以检查一致的逻辑以检查吗？不一致的是，过去的实际唯一性施用了实验和信息哈德被建模，作为唯一一致的可能性，它们在概率理论中描述的方式。然而，术语易于理解，所有对语言信息的神经科学都不是完全适合关键西方科学要求。或许也许是一个替代科学可以从非二进制逻辑一致地构成，允许术语“软”科学成为正确的，反对“硬”科学，从那以后应该被称为“清脆”科学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号