首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Tensions Arising When Teaching Scientific Disciplinary Core Ideas via Engineering Practices (Evaluation)
【24h】

Tensions Arising When Teaching Scientific Disciplinary Core Ideas via Engineering Practices (Evaluation)

机译:通过工程实践教学科学纪律核心思想时出现的紧张局势(评估)

获取原文

摘要

The Framework for K-12 Science Education calls for engineering practices to be integrated into the teaching and learning of science. We have developed a new instructional model to meet this need, so that teachers are able to develop engineering design tasks that will give students an opportunity to learn how to use engineering practices and the core ideas of science at the same time to develop solutions to meaningful problems. A number of tensions have arisen as we have iteratively designed and tested this new instructional framework in middle school classrooms. In this paper, we identify five specific tensions that arise from (1) attempting to integrate engineering practices and core ideas in non-NGSS states; (2) a need to focus on scientific concepts and engineering practices at the same time; (3) the time required to engaged in engineering practices; (4) different epistemological norms of scientific and engineering communities; and, (5) attempting to balance authenticity and feasibility inside science classrooms. We anticipate that these tensions will arise whenever educators attempt to develop design tasks that integrate engineering practices and core ideas of science for use in science classrooms. While we are unable to provide definitive recommendations for resolving the five tensions prior to beginning a new curriculum or instructional development project, awareness of these potential obstacles will likely ease the challenges associated with the integration of engineering and science in the future projects.
机译:K-12科学教育的框架要求融入科学教学和学习的工程实践。我们开发了一个新的教学模式,以满足这种需求,使教师能够开发工程设计任务,让学生有机会了解如何使用工程实践和科学核心思想,同时开发有意义的解决方案问题。由于我们迭代地设计和测试了这一新的教学框架,因此出现了许多紧张局势。在本文中,我们确定了五个特定的紧张局势(1)试图将工程实践和非NGSS国家的核心思想集成; (2)需要关注科学概念和工程惯例; (3)从事工程实践所需的时间; (4)科学和工程社区的不同认识论规范; (5)试图在科学课堂内平衡真实性和可行性。我们预计在教育工作者试图开发整合工程实践和科学核心课程中使用科学教室的设计任务时会出现这些紧张局势。虽然我们无法在开始新的课程或教学发展项目之前解决五个紧张局势的明确建议,但对这些潜在障碍的认识可能会缓解与未来项目中工程和科学融合有关的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号