首页> 外文会议>American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >A FUNCTIONAL K-12 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY
【24h】

A FUNCTIONAL K-12 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY

机译:技术识字术的功能k-12概念框架

获取原文

摘要

This is a presentation of an epistemological framework for teaching technology such that it will bring about improved technological literacy in ALL K-12 students. Design, Living, Productivity, and Foundational Technical Concepts anchor our conceptual framework for teaching technology educators. This conceptual framework for teaching technology literacy is functional, standards based, and can accommodate multiple pedagogies. It meets the standards of ITEA/CTTE, the New York State Dept of Ed., NCATE, and others. It also aligns with drafts of the NAEP Technological Literacy Assessment. We have several successful Engineering Technology programs and a Technology Education program within our department. In 2007, faculty these programs worked together to provide engineering education professional development experiences for nearly 400 teachers; who in turn have taught thousands of K-12 students. This was facilitated with the assistance of a $1.7 million grant, and visiting faculty from several leading design centers in England. This conceptual framework is partially a result of the findings of that project. Within our Technology Education program, this is our framework for preparing technology teachers. These teachers promote technological literacy and engineering. The four elements of the framework are 1) Design, 2) Living, 3) Productivity, and 4) Foundational Technical Concepts (FTCs). These elements are based upon decades of best practices from all over the world. The Design Element relies heavily upon the British successes in the past 25 years. Design is not only a summary experience for students but also pedagogy for practitioners. Design is an active mode of learning and a proper way to become literate in the tools and processes that promote productive life. The Life/Living Element becomes the students' mechanism for personalizing the learning experiences. All technological content is delivered relative to the learners' existence; hence it is all relevant. The Productivity Element explores how to determine if a process, tool, or system produces desired results. Productivity is known through consideration of benefits, expenses, and undesired effects. Every technology has values according to measures of productivity. FTCs are a large set of common technical concepts (commonly contained within the many "standards" or "benchmarks" for teaching technology). FTCs range from classic mechanics to biotechnology. It is not as important that every FTC be mastered by the learner - as it is only FTCs the learner can integrate into their context that are truly learned. This strategy for defining relevant technical content by the life of the learner is radical.
机译:这是一个关于教学技术的认识论框架的介绍,使得它将在所有K-12学生中提高技术素质。设计,生活,生产力和基础技术概念以教学技术教育者为主的概念框架。这种教学技术扫盲的概念框架是功能性的,基于标准,可以容纳多个教育。它符合ITEA / CTTE的标准,纽约州ED。,NCATE等。它还与Naep技术扫盲评估草案一致。我们有几个成功的工程技术计划和我们部门的技术教育计划。 2007年,教师这些方案致力于为近400名教师提供工程教育专业发展经验;谁又教了成千上万的K-12学生。这是促进了170万美元的批准,并从英格兰的几个领先设计中心访问的教师。这种概念框架部分是该项目结果的结果。在我们的技术教育计划中,这是我们为技术教师提供的框架。这些教师促进了技术扫盲和工程。框架的四个要素是1)设计,2)生活,3)生产力和4)基础技术概念(FTCS)。这些要素基于来自世界各地的数十年的最佳实践。设计元素严重依赖于过去25年的英国成功。设计不仅是学生的摘要经验,还对从业者的教育学。设计是一种积极的学习方式,以及在促进生产生活的工具和流程中成为识字的正确方法。生活/生活元素成为学生的个性化学习经历的机制。所有技术内容都相对于学习者的存在提供;因此,它都是相关的。生产力元素探讨如何确定进程,工具或系统是否产生所需的结果。通过考虑益处,费用和不期望的影响,提出了生产率。每种技术都有根据生产率的测量值。 FTCS是一大集的常见技术概念(通常包含在许多标准“或”基准“的教学技术中)。 FTCS系列从经典技工到生物技术。学习者掌握每一个FTC都不重要 - 因为它只是FTCS,学习者可以集成到他们真正学习的上下文中。通过学习者的生命定义相关技术内容的这种策略是激进的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号