首页> 外文会议>American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Two Years Later: A longitudinal look at the impact of engineering ethics education
【24h】

Two Years Later: A longitudinal look at the impact of engineering ethics education

机译:两年后:纵向看工程伦理教育的影响

获取原文

摘要

Between accreditation requirements [1] and national reports on the future of engineering, considerable attention has been given to the need for better ethics education in the engineering curriculum [2-3]. Several publications have been written about various approaches to addressing this need (e.g. see Herkert, 2000 [4]). The current state of affairs is a wide-array of pedagogies used in undergraduate engineering education to teach ethics, ranging from direct lectures on moral philosophy, to courses based on community service, to the use of online ethics tutorials. While there is an abundance of techniques for conveying ethics education, comparatively little work has been done in assessing the impact of these techniques on students. Overall, we have a good sense of "how" to teach ethics, but are less clear on the impact it is having on our students relative to other experiences they have while in college; in part because of a lack of assessment tools. To make matters worse, assessment is often limited to the context of the specific intervention (e.g. a single class or program) making the results less generalizable. Further, assessments are usually conducted at one point in time, or only over a single semester. An exception to this is the work done by Barry [5] who examined the impact of ethics education initiatives on students' knowledge of ethics as measured by Fundamentals of Engineering [6] examination results. And assessment efforts are usually not connected to a grounding theory of the ethical development of individuals through the college years. The result is a limited ability to separate the impact of a single intervention from other experiences that students may have during their academic careers.
机译:在认证要求[1]与工程未来的国家报告之间,对工程课程中更好的道德教育的需求得到了相当大的关注[2-3]。已经写了一些关于解决这种需求的各种方法(例如,参见Herkert,2000 [4])。目前的事态是在本科工程教育中使用的广泛教育学,教导道德,从道德哲学的直接讲座,基于社区服务的课程,在线道德教程的使用。虽然有丰富的传递道德教育技术,但在评估这些技术对学生的影响方面取得了相对较少的工作。总体而言,我们有一个良好的“如何”教导道德,但对我们学生相对于他们在大学的其他经验的影响不太清楚;部分原因是缺乏评估工具。为了使事项更糟糕,评估通常限于特定干预的背景(例如单一类别或计划),使得结果不太宽容。此外,评估通常在一个时间点,或仅在单个学期。这是Barry [5]的工作,谁审查了伦理教育倡议对学生对伦理学知识的影响,以通过工程基础来衡量[6]考试结果。和评估努力通常没有通过大学岁月的伦理发展的接地理论。结果是将单一干预与学生在学术职业中可能拥有的其他经验中的影响分开的能力有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号