首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Education, Management, Commerce and Society >Efficacy Comparison of Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy and Pneumatic Lithotripsy on Ureteral Calculi of the Elderly
【24h】

Efficacy Comparison of Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy and Pneumatic Lithotripsy on Ureteral Calculi of the Elderly

机译:输尿管科钬激光碎石术和气动性碎石术对老年人输尿管结石的疗效比较

获取原文

摘要

75 elderly patients with ureteral calculi, treated by Department of Urology in Zunyi County People's Hospital from 2008 to September 2010, were comparatively analyzed. calculi breaking success rate, calculi clearance rate, operation time, hospital stay and other aspect of the two treatment methods were observed. The results showed that one-time success rate of LL group was higher than that of PL group with significant difference; Clearance rate of LL group was significantly higher than that of PL group with significant difference. Operation time of LL group was significantly less than that of PL group with significant difference; comparative difference of hospital stay had no statistical significance. Comparative analysis showed that LL group was better than PL group in three aspects of one-time calculi breaking success rate, calculi clearance rate, operation time, etc., which is ideal calculi breaking means for treating ureteral calculi for the elderly.
机译:75名老年人患有津基县人民医院泌尿科部门治疗的患有的输尿管结石患者比较分析。观察了计算成功率,计算了两种治疗方法的计算清除率,操作时间,医院住宿和其他方面。结果表明,LL组的一次性成功率高于PL组具有显着差异的成功率; LL组的清除率明显高于PL组的显着差异。 LL组的操作时间明显小于PL组的显着差异;住院住院的比较差异无统计学意义。比较分析表明,在一次性计算的三个方面,L1组优于PL组,其是一次性计算的结算率,操作时间等,这是一种用于治疗老年人的输尿管结石的理想结石突破装置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号