Using Systemizing-Empathizing Theory to Explore Individual Differences in Resilience by Brain Types

机译：利用系统化同情理论探讨大脑类型的孤立力的个体差异

获取原文

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

As a key competence to bounce back from adversity, resilience is crucial for maintaining positive physical and mental health. However, not everyone is able to overcome stressful situations and individuals demonstrate various levels of resilience. In the present study, 120 undergraduates from China completed questionnaires on their resilience, systemizing and empathizing tendency. No gender difference was revealed in resilience. However, individuals with extreme brain types (high empathizers and high systemizers) demonstrated stronger resilience than those with more balanced brain types. Nonetheless, gender typical brain type group (empathizing-oriented women and systemizing-oriented men) showed similar level of resilience with the gender atypical brain type group (systemizing-oriented women and empathizing-oriented men). Both systemizing and empathizing were positively correlated with resilience. Such results indicated that excellence in interpersonal or analytical skills may facilitate strategies to deal with adversity.

机译：作为从逆境中反弹的关键能力，恢复力对于保持积极的身心健康至关重要。但是，不是每个人都能够克服压力的情况，个人展示各种各样的韧性。在本研究中，来自中国的120名本科生就完成了他们的恢复力，系统化和同情趋势。没有性别差异在恢复力中揭示了。然而，具有极端大脑类型（高情者和高系统）的个体表现出比具有更平衡的大脑类型更强的弹性。尽管如此，性别典型的大脑型集团（以性别为导向的妇女和系统化的男性）表现出类似的性别非典型脑型集团的恢复能力相似（系统化的妇女和以社会为导向的男性）。系统化和同情都与弹性正相关。这些结果表明，人际关系或分析技能的卓越可以促进处理逆境的策略。

著录项

来源
《International Conference on Mental Health and Humanities Education》|2020年|333p|共11页
会议地点
作者
Nao Yu;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类 B84-53;
关键词
Resilience; Individual differences; Empathizing and systemizing;

机译：弹性;个人差异;同情和系统化;
入库时间 2022-08-21 11:51:32

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Individual differences in the brain are associated with resilience versus susceptibility to lipopolysaccharide-induced memory impairment [J] . Tang Hui, Ji Muhuo, Zong Manman, Neuroscience Letters: An International Multidisciplinary Journal Devoted to the Rapid Publication of Basic Research in the Brain Sciences . 2018,第期

机译：大脑中的个体差异与脂多糖引起的血清多糖引起的记忆障碍的韧性与易感性相关
2. Is the Social Brain Theory Applicable to Human Individual Differences? Relationship between Sociability Personality Dimension and Brain Size: [J] . Kl??ra Horv??th, J??nos Martos, B??la Mihalik, Evolutionary Psychology . 2011,第2期

机译：社会大脑理论是否适用于人类个体差异？社交性人格维度与大脑大小之间的关系：
3. Why are attitude-behaviour inconsistencies uncomfortable? Using motivational theories to explore individual differences in dissonance arousal and motivation to compensate [J] . Lavergne Karine J., Pelletier Luc G. Motivation and emotion . 2016,第6期

机译：为什么态度-行为不一致会令人不舒服？使用动机理论探索不和谐唤醒和动机补偿的个体差异
4. Using Systemizing-Empathizing Theory to Explore Individual Differences in Resilience by Brain Types [C] . Nao Yu International Conference on Mental Health and Humanities Education . 2020

机译：利用系统化同情理论探讨大脑类型的孤立力的个体差异
5. Contributions of individual differences in stress reactivity to post-traumatic stress disorder vulnerability and resilience. [D] . Hill, Jonathan Edward. 2013

机译：应激反应性的个体差异对创伤后应激障碍脆弱性和适应力的贡献。
6. Autistic traits and individual brain differences: functional network efficiency reflects attentional and social impairments structural nodal efficiencies index systemising and theory-of-mind skills [O] . Subhadip Paul, Aditi Arora, Rashi Midha, 2021

机译：自闭症特征和个人脑差异：功能网络效率反映了注意力和社会障碍结构节点效率指数的系统化和思想理论
7. : "This paper deals with the functionality of the flaked stone assemblages from several Neolithic sites of the NE of the Iberian Peninsula. The chronological framework ranges from the mid-6th to the mid-4th millennium cal. BCE, which corresponds to the Early and Middle Neolithic. This long period ranges from the arrival of the first farming communities in the Iberian Peninsula, around 5600-5500 cal. BCE, to 3600-3500 cal. BCE, two millennia later, when Neolithic communities had stably occupied most of the available territory, from the mountainous areas of the Pyrenees to the coastal areas of the Mediterranean.In this context, the NE of the Iberian Peninsula is one of the areas where a major number of use-wear analyses have been carried out, especially for what concerns the Neolithic period. This is mainly due to the interest shown by the directors of the excavations and by the Spanish use-wear specialists as well; both participated and cooperated in order to enlarge the number of contexts studied, making the NE of the Iberian Peninsula one of the areas of Europe with the largest number of ‘functional studies’. As a result, today we have a reliable picture of the type of lithic tools used by the first farming groups, how they were used, and which needs they were satisfying.The methodology employed for this type of analysis is today broadly shared by most use-wear specialists. A stereoscopic microscope is used together with a reflected-light microscope for the analysis of the archaeological specimens. Afterwards, the observed use-wear traces are compared with the traces from experimental tools. This study primarily made use of the tools preserved at the ‘Traceoteque’ of the Institución Milà y Fontanals of the CSIC of Barcelona.This paper presents the results obtained for the different types of analysed sites and the relative lithic assemblages. In this way, tools from different contexts are compared: open-air sites, caves and rock-shelters, pit-sites, burials, and mining sites. Such a diversity of contexts allowed for the exploration of the existence of recurrences and differences in the functionality of the lithic tools from one site to another. The results obtained have also provided information on some aspects related to the economic processes carried out at the different sites, caves, rock-shelters and open-air contexts. It has been possible to gain fresh data on the types of tasks carried out and their relative importance for each site, their relation with the geographical and environmental context and the natural resources available there. In addition, analysing tools recovered from burials – mainly individual inhumations – provided information on the relationships between the buried individuals and the working tools, in particular exploring the relationships between sex and age patterns and the types of tools deposited as goods.In conclusion, use-wear analysis allowed for the exploration of a variety of issues; from technical aspects related to the production and management of the lithic resources to social aspects related to the subsistence activities and the individuals that carried them out." [O] . Gibaja Bao, Juan Francisco, Mazzucco, Niccolo 2015

机译：：“本文研究了伊比利亚半岛东北部几个新石器时代遗址的片状石材组合的功能。时间框架从公元前6世纪中叶到4世纪中叶，分别对应于早期和早期。新石器时代中期，这段时间的长短是从伊比利亚半岛的第一个农业社区到来，大约在公元前5600-5500 cal，到了两千年后的3600-3500 BCE，当时新石器时代的社区稳定地占据了大部分可用土地。从比利牛斯山脉山区到地中海沿岸地区。在这种情况下，伊比利亚半岛东北部是进行过大量使用磨损分析的地区之一，尤其是在关注方面新石器时代，这主要是由于发掘负责人和西班牙使用服装专家表现出的浓厚兴趣；他们参与和合作以扩大孔蒂的数量xts进行了研究，使伊比利亚半岛的NE成为“功能研究”数量最多的欧洲地区之一。结果，今天我们可以可靠地了解第一批耕作小组使用的石器工具的类型，使用方法以及它们满足的需求。今天，大多数使用方法广泛共享用于这种类型的分析的方法穿专家。立体显微镜与反射光显微镜一起用于分析考古样本。然后，将观察到的使用磨损痕迹与实验工具的痕迹进行比较。这项研究主要利用了巴塞罗那CSIC的米拉·丰塔纳尔研究所的“ Traceoteque”中保存的工具。本文介绍了针对不同类型的分析地点和相对石器组合所获得的结果。通过这种方式，可以比较来自不同环境的工具：露天场所，洞穴和岩石避难所，露天场所，埋葬场所和采矿场所。如此多样的上下文允许探索重复性的存在以及从一个站点到另一个站点的石器工具的功能差异。所获得的结果还提供了与在不同地点，洞穴，避难所和露天环境中进行的经济过程有关的某些方面的信息。可以获得有关所执行任务的类型及其对每个站点的相对重要性，它们与地理和环境环境以及那里可用自然资源的关系的新数据。此外，对从墓葬中回收的工具（主要是个人遗体）进行分析，可提供有关被掩埋的个体与工作工具之间关系的信息，尤其是探索性别与年龄模式之间的关系以及作为商品存放的工具的类型。磨损分析允许探索各种问题；从与石器资源的生产和管理有关的技术方面到与自给活动及其实施者有关的社会方面。”

Using Systemizing-Empathizing Theory to Explore Individual Differences in Resilience by Brain Types

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅