• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Linking dynamic capabilities, operational capabilities and firm resources to performance.
【24h】

Linking dynamic capabilities, operational capabilities and firm resources to performance.

机译：将动态能力，运营能力和公司资源与绩效联系起来。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The primary objective of this dissertation is to enhance our understanding of dynamic capabilities by distinguishing them from operational capabilities and by showing how they contribute to firm performance through the renewal of operational capabilities and through the reconfiguration of resources.;It is important to distinguish between dynamic and operational capabilities in order to avoid confusion about whether a given capability should be considered dynamic or operational. Current literature on this topic argues that dynamic capabilities are those firm capabilities that can induce changes in other capabilities, while operational capabilities are static. Distinguishing between these capabilities in this manner is not helpful because changes occur continuously in all capabilities to at least some extent and empirical studies show that even task-level operational capabilities can change on their own and induce changes in other capabilities. In contrast to focusing on the presence or lack of change to determine if a capability is dynamic or operational, I argue that we might be able to distinguish between them by determining the outcome of changes induced by capabilities. By focusing on the outcomes of changes rather than the changes themselves, I argue that capabilities should be considered operational if they produce outcomes that can be predicted using probability distribution while those capabilities that produce outcomes that cannot be predicted using probability distribution should be considered dynamic.;Although the dynamic capability framework argues that dynamic capabilities influence firm performance by renewing operational capabilities, it is unclear from prior studies whether they actually influence firm performance through operational capabilities. It is also unclear whether a dynamic capability influences firm performance through the renewal of a single operational capability or several of them. Using a firm's capability to learn from customers as a proxy for a dynamic capability, I find that it renews the process-quality, process-efficiency and operational flexibility capabilities, but influences firm performance only through the process-quality capability. The renewal of the process-efficiency and operational flexibility capabilities serves to maintain existing operations. Capabilities that simultaneously influence performance and maintain existing operations are termed dual-purpose capabilities. I provide empirical support for the existence of dual-purpose capabilities.;Prior studies in dynamic capabilities argue that dynamic capabilities help a firm to gain a competitive advantage by creating new resources and capabilities in a rapidly changing environment. Although this is true, I argue that a firm's dynamic capabilities can also influence firm performance by increasing the productivity of a firm's existing resources by creating resource configurations that are optimal in complementarity. I find that a firm's resource reconfiguration capability influences resource complementarity, which in turn influences firm performance. Since a firm's resource reconfiguration capability, a dynamic capability, can influence firm performance in a way other than by creating new resources and capabilities, I argue that all firms can benefit from investing in resource reconfiguration capabilities, a component of dynamic capabilities. This argument contrasts with current dynamic capability literature, which argues that dynamic capabilities are beneficial only for firms that operate in rapidly changing environments.
机译：本论文的主要目的是通过将动态能力与运营能力区分开来，并通过展示其如何通过更新运营能力和重新配置资源来对企业绩效做出贡献，从而增强我们对动态能力的理解。和操作能力，以避免混淆将给定功能视为动态还是可操作。关于该主题的最新文献认为，动态能力是那些可以引起其他能力发生变化的公司能力，而操作能力是静态的。以这种方式区分这些功能没有帮助，因为所有功能至少在一定程度上连续发生变化，而且经验研究表明，即使任务级操作功能也可以自行更改并引起其他功能的更改。与专注于确定是否存在动态或可更改的变化相反，我认为我们可以通过确定由功能引起的更改的结果来区分它们。通过关注变化的结果，而不是变化本身，我认为，如果能力产生可以使用概率分布预测的结果，则应该将其视为可操作的，而产生不能使用概率分布预测的结果的能力应该被认为是动态的。 ；尽管动态能力框架认为动态能力会通过更新运营能力来影响公司绩效，但是根据先前的研究尚不清楚它们是否通过运营能力真正影响了公司绩效。还不清楚动态能力是否会通过更新一项或多项操作能力来影响公司绩效。我发现使用公司的能力来向客户学习作为动态能力的代理，我发现它可以更新过程质量，过程效率和运营灵活性能力，但是仅通过过程质量能力影响公司绩效。流程效率和操作灵活性功能的更新有助于维护现有操作。同时影响性能并维持现有操作的功能称为双重用途功能。我为双重用途能力的存在提供实证支持。动态能力的先前研究认为，动态能力通过在快速变化的环境中创造新的资源和能力来帮助公司获得竞争优势。尽管这是事实，但我认为企业的动态能力还可以通过创建互补性最佳的资源配置来提高企业现有资源的生产率，从而影响企业绩效。我发现企业的资源重组能力会影响资源互补性，进而影响企业绩效。由于企业的资源重构能力（动态能力）可以通过创建新资源和能力以外的方式影响企业绩效，因此我认为所有企业都可以从对资源重构能力（动态能力的组成部分）的投资中受益。该论点与当前的动态能力文献相反，后者认为动态能力仅对在快速变化的环境中运营的公司有利。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dangol, Ramesh.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 165 p.
  • 总页数 165
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号