• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Doxa of modernization: The sense of political reality in historiographies of the late Ottoman Empire.
【24h】

Doxa of modernization: The sense of political reality in historiographies of the late Ottoman Empire.

机译：现代化的Doxa：已故的奥斯曼帝国史学中的政治现实感。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The notion of modernization has long been a hegemonic explanation for existing global and social hierarchies. Despite the apparent "failure" of "modernizing" countries to overcome a disadvantaged position in the global hierarchy through "modernizing" means, the political life in countries such as Turkey continues to be dominated by perspectives that take "modernization" as a solution for problems for granted. This dissertation examines the sense of political reality that produces an absence of formulations of alternatives to this seemingly "universal" path of historical development and social change through an analytical reading of selected historiographies of the late Ottoman Empire. This analysis relies on Bourdieu's theory of doxa as the sense of limits shared both by "orthodoxy" and "heterodoxy." It first examines the construction of the modernization perspective from an orthodox view in order to identify the limits of the sense of political and historical reality it entails. It then examines three historical studies which are critical of modernizationist orthodoxy under the same criteria. What I call "doxa of modernization" emerges in the shared sense of reality among the orthodox and heterodox accounts. This doxa consists of the generalization of the particular social characteristics and historical conditions seen as constituting a process of "modernization" - namely, the history of power and capital - in such a way that they come to represent all of historical change and of politics. The study concludes by proposing to shift our perspective from a focus on capital to labor in order to bring into view social practices that produce political alternatives in the present.
机译：长期以来，现代化的概念一直是对现有全球和社会等级制度的霸权解释。尽管“现代化”国家显然无法通过“现代化”手段克服全球等级制度中处于不利地位的地位，但诸如土耳其这样的国家的政治生活仍继续受到以“现代化”作为解决问题的观点的支配。理所当然。本文通过对奥斯曼帝国晚期的选定史学的分析性解读，考察了政治现实感，这种政治现实感导致缺乏这种看似“普遍”的历史发展和社会变革道路的替代方案。这种分析依赖于布迪厄（Bourdieu）的doxa理论，即“正统”和“杂合”都具有局限性。首先，它从正统的角度考察了现代化视角的建构，以便确定其所带来的政治和历史现实感的局限性。然后，它审查了在相同条件下对现代化正统批评至关重要的三项历史研究。我所说的“现代化的道萨”是在正统和异端的账目中以共同的现实意义出现的。这种现象由特定的社会特征和历史条件的概括所组成，这些历史特征和历史条件被视为构成“现代化”的过程-即权力和资本的历史-以某种方式代表了所有的历史变迁和政治。该研究的结论是建议将我们的观点从对资本的关注转向对劳动力的关注，以期考虑目前产生政治替代选择的社会实践。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mucen, Baris.;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;

  • 授予单位 Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;
  • 学科 History General.;Sociology General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 220 p.
  • 总页数 220
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界史;社会学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号