The present paper mainly explicates Hempe’s critiques on the principle of “affirmation”and “falsification”toward the standard of the cognitive significance of the proposition.Based on the lo-gistic postulates,Hempe pointed out that the"affirmation"principle violates A theorem and its two in-ferences:A1 and A2.Seemingly,the "falsification" principle disobeys the above theorems too.In Hempe’s view,it is too narrow to the “affirmation”principle and too wide to the “falsification”princi-ple.In the end,Hempe made out an opinion of the “holistic explanation system”,and he gave four re-quirements on the system.In conclusion,Hempe’s idea is a theoretical origin and inspiration to the fol-lowing critiques on the Logical Empiricism,especially Quine’s “Two Dogmas of the Empiricism”.%亨普尔基于逻辑公理，指出“确证原则”违反了公理 A 和两个推论 A1和 A2。类似地，“证伪原则”也违反了上述公理。亨普尔认为“确证原则”过于狭窄，而“证伪原则”又太过于宽泛。他提出了一种整体的解释理论系统的观点，同时对意义解释系统的特点提出了四点要求。亨普尔的观点为蒯因彻底批判逻辑经验主义提供了重要的理论来源和启示。
展开▼
