• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Comparison of the safety and efficacy between linear stapler and circular stapler in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Comparison of the safety and efficacy between linear stapler and circular stapler in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译：线性吻合器和圆形吻合器在全腹腔镜全胃切除术中的安全性和有效性比较：方案的系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

IntroductionTotal gastrectomy is often recommended for upper body gastric cancer, and totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) is deemed to be a promising surgical method with the well-known advantages such as less invasion and fast recovery. However, the anastomosis between oesophagus and jejunum is the difficulty of TLTG. Although staplers have promoted the development of TLTG, the choice of suitable staplers to complete oesophagojejunostomy is controversial and unclear. Therefore, a higher level of research evidence is needed to compare the two types of staplers in terms of safety and efficacy for oesophagojejunostomy in TLTG among patients with gastric cancer.
机译：简介通常建议对上体胃癌行全胃切除术，而全腹腔镜全胃切除术（TLTG）被认为是一种有前途的外科手术方法，其众所周知的优点是其浸润少，恢复快。然而，食管和空肠之间的吻合是TLTG的难点。尽管订书机促进了TLTG的发展，但选择合适的订书机完成食管空肠吻合术仍存在争议，目前尚不清楚。因此，需要更高水平的研究证据来比较胃癌患者中TLTG食管空肠吻合术的两种安全性和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号