...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Academy of Management Journal >ANATOMY OF AN R&R (OR, REVIEWERS ARE AN AUTHOR'S BEST FRIENDS. . .)
【24h】

ANATOMY OF AN R&R (OR, REVIEWERS ARE AN AUTHOR'S BEST FRIENDS. . .)

机译：R＆R的解剖（或评论者是作者的最佳朋友。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In a recent "From the Editors" column (Rynes et al., 2005), the editors at AMJ discussed publication standards, processes, and strategies authors might use to improve their chances of having manuscripts accepted at AMJ. The editors also referenced interesting discussions of the publication process in the organizational sciences (e.g., Cummings & Frost, 1995; Huff, 1998) that might help authors develop strategies to get published. However, a perusal of this literature reveals that relatively little attention has been explicitly devoted to the phase of the publication process that takes place after an author has received an invitation to revise and resubmit his or her manuscript: the famous R&R. This is an important oversight because, as Rynes and her colleagues (2005) pointed out, 50 percent of the papers that receive R&Rs at AMJ are subsequently rejected. Revise and resubmit is an important part of the publication process—the make-or-break point— and it should not be neglected or underemphasized.
机译：在最近的“来自编辑者”专栏中（Rynes等人，2005年），AMJ的编辑们讨论了出版标准，过程和策略，作者可能会使用这些标准，过程和策略来提高他们被AMJ接受稿件的机会。编辑们还引用了组织科学中有关出版过程的有趣讨论（例如Cummings＆Frost，1995; Huff，1998），这可能有助于作者制定出版策略。但是，对这些文献的细读显示，在作者收到修改和重新提交他或她的手稿（即著名的R＆R）的邀请后，对出版过程的阶段的关注相对较少。这是一个重要的疏忽，因为正如Rynes和她的同事（2005年）所指出的那样，AMJ收到R＆R的论文中有50％随后被拒绝了。修订和重新提交是发布过程中的重要部分（即成败点），不应忽视或强调它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号