首页> 外文期刊>Academy of management learning & education >Reviewing Diversity Training: Where We Have Been and Where We Should Go
【24h】

Reviewing Diversity Training: Where We Have Been and Where We Should Go

机译:复习多样性培训:我们去过的地方和应该去的地方

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We review and critically examine 178 articles whose authors have investigated numerous aspects of diversity training programs on campuses and in the workplace. We first examine the characteristics of the research, including sample, study method, and theoretical framework. Consistent with the training framework of Baldwin and Ford (1988) and Blume and colleagues (2010), we then organize the articles by the context of training, training design, trainees' characteristics, and training outputs. Although we found a myriad of different forms, shapes, and combinations of diversity training in terms of its design elements, some programs (e.g., integrated training) were relatively rare, yet authors viewed them more positively than other programs (e.g., stand-alone training). We discuss gaps in the literature and provide suggestions for future research on diversity training.
机译:我们审查并严格审查了178篇文章,其作者调查了校园和工作场所多样性培训计划的许多方面。我们首先检查研究的特征,包括样本,研究方法和理论框架。与Baldwin和Ford(1988)和Blume及其同事(2010)的培训框架相一致,然后我们根据培训,培训设计,受训人员的特征和培训输出的上下文来组织文章。尽管就设计元素而言,我们发现了各种各样的形式,形状和多样性培训组合,但是某些程序(例如,综合培训)相对较少,但是作者比其他程序(例如,独立的)对它们的看法更为积极训练)。我们讨论了文献中的空白,并为以后的多元化培训研究提供了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号