...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of International Affairs >Australia-China FTA: China's domestic politics and the roots of different national approaches to FTAs
【24h】

Australia-China FTA: China's domestic politics and the roots of different national approaches to FTAs

机译：中澳自贸协定：中国的国内政治以及自贸协定采取不同国家方法的根源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article seeks to explain why the Free Trade Agreement negotiation between Australia and China has been extremely difficult, despite political goodwill from Beijing and Canberra. It first argues that the reason for the slow progress of the negotiation is not caused by lack of motivation from the Chinese government. It then lists the differences in negotiation between China and Australia, focusing on their respective selective vs. comprehensive, border vs. behind-the-border, flexible vs. rigid and state vs. market approaches. It then looks into domestic politics in China to explain why China has taken such a stance, underlining domestic resistance from sectors like agriculture and services in a dynamic domestic political environment on the one hand, and the structure of the policymaking institution that constrains the power of trade negotiators on the other. It concludes by pointing out where the potential for a breakthrough in the FTA negotiation lies.
机译：本文试图解释为什么尽管北京和堪培拉之间有着政治上的善意，但澳大利亚和中国之间的自由贸易协定谈判却极为困难。首先，它认为谈判进展缓慢的原因并不是中国政府缺乏动力。然后，它列出了中国和澳大利亚在谈判中的差异，着眼于它们各自的选择性与全面，边界与边境，灵活与僵化以及州与市场的方式。然后，它着眼于中国的国内政治，以解释中国为何采取这种立场，一方面强调在动态的国内政治环境中来自农业和服务业等行业的国内阻力，另一方面是制约政策制定力量的决策机构的结构。贸易谈判代表。最后指出了在FTA谈判中取得突破的潜力所在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号