From protecting rights to aiding law enforcement: trends in the 'search incident to arrest' doctrine since Chimel v. California

David M. Jones

首页> 外文期刊>Criminal Justice Studies >From protecting rights to aiding law enforcement: trends in the 'search incident to arrest' doctrine since Chimel v. California

【24h】

From protecting rights to aiding law enforcement: trends in the 'search incident to arrest' doctrine since Chimel v. California

机译：从保护权利到协助执法：自Chimel诉California一案以来，“搜捕事件”原则的趋势

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

When the US Supreme Court decided Chimel v. California in 1969, it was perceived as a means of restraining the police power in this country and of strengthening Fourth Amendment rights. However, subsequent decisions made by both the Supreme Court and lower federal courts have changed this so that, currently, the 'search incident to an arrest doctrine' now enhances the power of law enforcement agents.

机译：当美国最高法院于1969年判决Chimel诉加利福尼亚州时，这被视为限制该国警察权力和加强第四修正案权利的一种手段。但是，最高法院和联邦下级法院随后作出的决定改变了这一点，因此，目前，“对逮捕原则的搜寻事件”现在增强了执法人员的权力。

著录项

来源
《Criminal Justice Studies》 |2008年第4期|295-310|共16页
作者
David M. Jones;
展开▼
作者单位

University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
search incident to an arrest; Fourth Amendment; search and seizure; federal courts; Chimel v. California; search incident; New York v. Belton; police discretion;

机译：搜索事件以逮捕;第四修正案;搜查和检取;联邦法院;奇梅尔诉加利福尼亚;搜索事件;纽约诉贝尔顿案;警察酌处权;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Wreck on the highway: the Supreme Court, search incident to arrest, the good faith exception, and Davis v. United States [J] . Jonathan Bolen, Craig Hemmens Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society . 2012,第2期

机译：在高速公路上残骸：最高法院，逮捕的搜查事件，善意例外以及戴维斯诉美国
2. Writing a manual for police officers: the Supreme Court revisits the vehicle search incident to arrest rule in Arizona v. Gant [J] . Craig Hemmensa* Cody Stoddarda Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society . 2010,第3期

机译：为警官撰写手册：最高法院重新审查了车辆搜寻事件，以逮捕亚利桑那诉甘特州的规则
3. Supreme Court Applies the Brakes to Vehicle Searches:Search Incident to Arrest Under Arizona v. Gant [J] . Randy Means, Pam McDonald Law and order . 2009,第7期

机译：最高法院对车辆搜索实施刹车：在亚利桑那州诉甘特案下逮捕搜索事件
4. Challenge of emerging technologies: balancing the needs of law enforcement against the duty to protect individual rights [C] . James A. Lingerfelt, Metropolitan Police Dept., Washington, Training, Education, and Liability Issues for Law Enforcement Scientists and Engineers . 1997

机译：新兴技术的挑战：在执法需求与保护个人权利的义务之间取得平衡
5. Tribal Sovereignty, Race, and the Supreme Court: Oliphant v. Suquamish as Exemplifying Prejudiced Doctrines of Indian Rights Case Law [D] . ?Stewart, Haley 2020

机译：部落主权，种族和最高法院：奥利芬特 v Suquamish 为印第安人的权利判例法的示范性偏正教义
6. Convergent ethical issues in HIV/AIDS tuberculosis and malaria vaccine trials in Africa: Report from the WHO/UNAIDS African AIDS Vaccine Programmes Ethics Law and Human Rights Collaborating Centre consultation 10-11 February 2009 Durban South Africa [O] . Nicole Mamotte, Douglas Wassenaar, Jennifer Koen, 2010

机译：非洲艾滋病毒/艾滋病结核病和疟疾疫苗试验中普遍存在的伦理问题：2009年2月10日至11日南非德班世卫组织/艾滋病规划署非洲艾滋病疫苗规划署道德法律与人权合作中心磋商会的报告
7. Fourth Amendment Search Incident to Arrest in the Home: Why Gant’s New Vehicular Rules Should Supersede Chimel [O] . Lampton Sidney 2016

机译：第四修正案搜查事件在家中被捕：为什么甘特的新车辆规则应取代奇梅尔

From protecting rights to aiding law enforcement: trends in the 'search incident to arrest' doctrine since Chimel v. California

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅