• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cybernetics & Human Knowing >Autopoiesis and Knowing: Reflections on Maturana's Biogenic Explanation of Cognition
【24h】

Autopoiesis and Knowing: Reflections on Maturana's Biogenic Explanation of Cognition

机译：自我生成与知识：对曼陀罗那对认知的生物解释的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Maturana advanced the first systematic explanation of cognition based solely on biological principles since Aristotle. This was a risky strategy to adopt, given the intellectual currents of his time. Had it been more influential, the autopoietic theory of cognition might well have brought us much sooner to the trends currently at the forefront of the cognitive sciences, including dynamical systems, embodied and situated cognition, the emphasis on action and interaction, and other biologically based challenges to the computational paradigm, which Maturana opposed. I argue that the autopoietic theory of cognition was premature for several reasons. While it could be said that developments in the cognitive sciences have overtaken it, I believe Maturana's theory, which he developed with Varela and others, still has much to offer contemporary theorists, despite its limitations.
机译：自从亚里斯多德以来，曼陀罗那就提出了第一个完全基于生物学原理的认知系统解释。考虑到他那个时代的知识潮流，采用这种冒险的策略。如果它具有更大的影响力，那么认知的自体理论很可能使我们更快地了解了当前处于认知科学最前沿的趋势，包括动力系统，体现和定位的认知，对动作和相互作用的重视以及其他基于生物学的认识。 Maturana反对的是对计算范式的挑战。我认为认知的自我生成理论还为时过早，原因有几个。尽管可以说认知科学的发展已经超越了认知科学，但我相信，尽管他的局限性有限，但他与瓦雷拉（Varela）和其他人一起发展的马图拉那的理论仍然可以为当代理论家提供很多帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号