...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence
【24h】

Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence

机译:救护人员使用在线临床证据

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Hospital-based clinicians have been shown to use and attain benefits from online evidence systems. To our knowledge there have been no studies investigating whether and how ambulance officers use online evidence systems if provided. We surveyed ambulance officers to examine their knowledge and use of the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP), an online evidence system providing 24-hour access to information to support evidence-based practice. Methods A questionnaire was completed by 278 ambulance officers in New South Wales, Australia. Comparisons were made between those who used CIAP and officers who had heard of, but not used CIAP. Results Half the sample (48.6%) knew of, and 28.8% had used CIAP. Users were more likely to have heard of CIAP from a CIAP representative/presentation, non-users from written information. Compared to ambulance officers who had heard of but had not used CIAP, users were more likely to report better computer skills and that their supervisors regarded use of CIAP as a legitimate part of ambulance officers' clinical role. The main reasons for non-use were lack of access(49.0%) and training(31.4%). Of users, 51.3% rated their skills at finding information as good/very good, 67.5% found the information sought all/most of the time, 87.3% believed CIAP had the potential to improve patient care and 28.2% had directly experienced this. Most access to CIAP occurred at home. The databases frequently accessed were MIMS (A medicines information database) (73.8%) and MEDLINE(67.5%). The major journals accessed were Journal of Emergency Nursing(37.5%), American Journal of Medicine(30.0%) and JAMA(27.5%). Conclusion Over half of ambulance officers had not heard of CIAP. The proportion who knew about and used CIAP was also low. Reasons for this appear to be a work culture not convinced of CIAP's relevance to pre-hospital patient care and lack of access to CIAP at work. Ambulance officers who used CIAP accessed it primarily from home and valued it highly. Lack of access to CIAP at central work locations deprives ambulance officers of many of the benefits of an online evidence system.
机译:背景技术已经表明,基于医院的临床医生可以使用在线证据系统并从中受益。据我们所知,没有研究调查救护人员是否以及如何使用在线证据系统(如果提供)。我们对救护人员进行了调查,以检查他们对临床信息访问计划(CIAP)的知识和使用情况,该信息是一种在线证据系统,可提供24小时的信息访问以支持基于证据的实践。方法由澳大利亚新南威尔士州的278名救护人员填写了调查表。对使用CIAP的人员和听说过但不使用CIAP的人员进行了比较。结果一半的样本(48.6%)知道,而28.8%的样本使用过CIAP。用户更有可能从CIAP代表/演示中听说过CIAP,非用户是从书面信息中听说过。与听说过但未使用CIAP的救护人员相比,用户更有可能报告更好的计算机技能,并且其主管将使用CIAP视为救护人员临床职责的合法组成部分。不使用的主要原因是缺乏访问权限(49.0%)和培训(31.4%)。在用户中,有51.3%的人认为自己的信息查找技巧是“好/非常好”,67.5%的人发现在所有/大部分时间中都在寻找信息,87.3%的人认为CIAP有改善患者护理的潜力,而28.2%的人直接体验过。对CIAP的大多数访问都发生在家里。经常访问的数据库是MIMS(药品信息数据库)(73.8%)和MEDLINE(67.5%)。访问的主要期刊为《急诊护理杂志》(37.5%),《美国医学杂志》(30.0%)和《美国医学会杂志》(27.5%)。结论超过一半的救护人员没有听说过CIAP。了解和使用CIAP的比例也很低。造成这种情况的原因似乎是一种工作文化,无法使CIAP确信与院前患者护理的相关性以及在工作中无法使用CIAP。使用CIAP的救护人员主要是在家中访问它,并高度评价它。在中心工作地点无法使用CIAP会使救护人员失去在线证据系统的许多好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号