• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Doctoral Studies >Is there a Core Curriculum across Higher Education Doctoral Programs?
【24h】

Is there a Core Curriculum across Higher Education Doctoral Programs?

机译：高等教育博士学位课程是否有核心课程？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Currently the study of higher education has been referred to as a multidisciplinary field. Consensus is continuing to evolve regarding both what is considered the appropriate coursework and the foundational knowledgebase of this field. The study of higher education is maturing and has the potential to transition from being seen as a field to being respected as an academic discipline. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the status of the core curriculum in higher education doctoral programs from the perspective of program directors with programs that required the completion of standardized coursework prior to beginning a dissertation. We used online survey analytic techniques to query program directors about their EdD and PhD programs in higher education, credit hours, and curricular content. Our study confirms previous work finding that there is common agreement in the subject matter areas of organization, leadership, administration, and history. What our work adds is that there is a growing consensus among higher education doctoral programs about the position of higher education law and finance in the curricular core. In addition, we find there is a growing interest in public policy and community colleges over time, with a majority of EdD programs including instruction in these areas. Nevertheless, majoritarian agreement does not meet at a level wherein consensus can be inferred, especially within PhD programs where requirements are more varied across programs. In addition, while there is an increasing trend in the inclusion of multiculturalism in higher education doctoral programming, multiculturalism is not currently part of higher education’s core. We conclude with research and practice implications for doctoral programs in higher education as a field of study.
机译：目前，高等教育的研究已被称为多学科领域。关于什么是适当的课程以及该领域的基础知识库，共识正在不断发展。高等教育研究正在日趋成熟，并有可能从被视为一个领域过渡到被视为一门学科。本研究的目的是从项目负责人的角度研究高等教育博士课程核心课程的现状，这些课程的内容要求在开始学位论文之前完成标准化的课程工作。我们使用在线调查分析技术来查询计划主管关于高等教育，学分和课程内容的教育和博士学位课程。我们的研究证实了先前的工作发现，即在组织，领导，行政和历史的主题领域存在共识。我们的工作增加的是，在高等教育博士课程中，人们对高等教育法律和金融在课程核心中的地位越来越达成共识。此外，随着时间的推移，我们发现对公共政策和社区大学的兴趣与日俱增，其中大部分的EdD计划都包括这些领域的指导。然而，多数派协议不能达到可以推断出共识的水平，尤其是在博士课程中，要求之间的差异更大。此外，尽管将多元文化主义纳入高等教育博士课程的趋势正在增加，但多元文化主义目前还不是高等教育核心。作为研究领域，我们对高等教育博士学位课程的研究和实践意义进行了总结。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号