...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>eNeurologicalSci >Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of a bundled intervention to enhance outcomes after stroke in Nigeria: Rationale and design
【24h】

Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of a bundled intervention to enhance outcomes after stroke in Nigeria: Rationale and design

机译：尼日利亚为提高卒中后结局而采取的一系列干预措施的成本和成本效益分析：基本原理和设计

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The economic and social costs of stroke to the society can be enormous. These costs can cause serious economic damage to both the individual and the nation. It is thus important to conduct a cost effectiveness analysis to indicate whether an intervention provides high value where its health benefits justify its costs. This study will provide evidence based on the costs of stroke with a view of improving intervention and treatments of stoke survivors in Nigeria. This study utilizes two types of economic evaluation methods – cost-effectiveness analysis and cost–benefit analysis – to determine the economic impact of Tailored Hospital-based Risk Reduction to Impede Vascular Events after Stroke (THRIVES) intervention. The study is conducted in four Nigerian hospitals where 400 patients are recruited to participate in the study. The cost-effectiveness of THRIVES post-discharge intervention is compared with the control Intervention scenario, which is the usual and customary care delivered at each health facility in terms of cost per quality adjusted life years (QALYs). It is expected that successful implementation of the project would serve as a model of cost-effective quality stroke care for implementation. Award Number: U01 NS079179. Trial registration: RL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01900756 Highlights ? Provides evidence on stroke costs towards improving treatment of stoke survivors ? Two evaluation methods -cost-effectiveness and cost–benefit analysis proposed ? Study to be conducted in four Nigerian hospitals with 400 patients as participants ? THRIVES Post-discharge intervention compared with control intervention scenario ? Successful outcome of THRIVES project will indicate cost-effective stroke care.
机译：中风给社会带来的经济和社会代价可能是巨大的。这些成本可能对个人和国家造成严重的经济损失。因此，重要的是进行成本效益分析，以表明一项干预措施是否可以在其健康益处证明其成本合理的情况下提供高价值。这项研究将基于中风的成本提供证据，以改善尼日利亚中风幸存者的干预和治疗。这项研究利用两种类型的经济评估方法（成本效益分析和成本效益分析）来确定基于医院的定制化风险降低对卒中后血管事件的经济影响（THRIVES）。该研究在尼日利亚的四家医院中进行，招募了400名患者参加该研究。将THRIVES出院后干预的成本效果与对照干预方案进行比较，该方案是按质量调整生命年（QALYs）的成本在每个医疗机构提供的常规护理和习惯护理。预期该项目的成功实施将成为实施具有成本效益的优质中风护理的典范。奖项编号：U01 NS079179试用注册：RL：http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符：NCT01900756要点？提供有关卒中成本以改善卒中幸存者治疗的证据吗？提出了两种评估方法-成本效益和成本效益分析？这项研究将在尼日利亚的四家医院进行，有400名患者参加？威胁出院后干预与控制干预方案相比？ THRIVES项目的成功成果将表明具有成本效益的中风护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号