• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food: Revista Internacional de Sociologia Sobre Agricultura y Alimentos >Why Do Farmers Collaborate with a Food Cooperative? Reasons for Participation in a Civic Food Network in Vienna, Austria
【24h】

Why Do Farmers Collaborate with a Food Cooperative? Reasons for Participation in a Civic Food Network in Vienna, Austria

机译：为何农民与食品合作社合作？参加奥地利维也纳公民食品网络的原因

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Food cooperatives can be qualified as a civic food network as they can create more embedded market relations between consumers and farmers and increase knowledge about food consumption. In this study, we explore why farmers collaborated with the consumer-initiated food co-op D’Speis in Vienna, and assess the food co-op’s potential to support a peasant mode of farming. Farmers and working members of the food co-op were interviewed. As the food co-op selected their suppliers depending on their production methods, i.e. small-scale and organic farming, all farmers showed some elements of peasant farming. The interaction between farmers and co-op members, especially regarding price negotiations and quality standards, provided farmers with more room to manoeuvre. As the food co-op’s contribution to farmers’ incomes was negligible, the food co-op mainly supported peasant farming in the sphere of social and cultural capital. However, the degree of collaboration differed substantially as more peasant farmers interacted more closely with the food co-op. The farmers and co-op members shared their criticism of the hegemonic food system, but on the other hand missed clear common goals. Both farmers and food co-op members regarded their practices as political acts for a different food system. Values deduced from these practices point towards food sovereignty, which could serve as a compass for common political actions.
机译：食品合作社可以成为公民食品网络，因为它们可以在消费者和农民之间建立更多的嵌入式市场关系，并增加有关食品消费的知识。在这项研究中，我们探讨了农民为何与消费者发起的维也纳食品合作社D'Speis合作，并评估了食品合作社支持农民耕种方式的潜力。采访了食品合作社的农民和工作成员。当食品合作社根据他们的生产方法（即小规模和有机农业）选择供应商时，所有农民都表现出一些农民耕作的要素。农民与合作社成员之间的互动，特别是在价格谈判和质量标准方面，为农民提供了更多的操作空间。由于粮食合作社对农民收入的贡献微不足道，因此粮食合作社主要在社会和文化资本领域支持了农民农业。但是，随着更多农民与粮食合作社之间的互动更加密切，合作的程度也大不相同。农民和合作社成员都对霸权食品体系提出了批评，但另一方面却错过了明确的共同目标。农民和粮食合作社成员都将其做法视为针对不同粮食系统的政治行为。从这些做法得出的价值指向粮食主权，可以作为共同政治行动的指南针。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号