• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy >Standards as epistemological practice. A study of how Danish school leaders use assessment findings in the development of leadership practice
【24h】

Standards as epistemological practice. A study of how Danish school leaders use assessment findings in the development of leadership practice

机译：标准作为认识论实践。丹麦学校领导如何在领导实践发展中使用评估结果的研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

ABSTRACTDuring recent years, we have seen an increase in the complexity of school leadership as knowledge work. The new forms of knowledge available to school leadership, such as performance data and survey-based data, raise the expectation that leaders make relevant use of these knowledge resources. Theory and policy claim that new knowledge is of instrumental use in leadership decision making, yet there are important limitations to this strand of efficiency thinking.?The paper analyzes leaders’ use of organizational assessment data for the purposes of developing their leadership practice. The paper constructs this empirical object as a composite of general quality standards and specific knowledge about each school. Accountability practices are taken to be specific to particular schools and professional organizations.?The paper explores how school leadership practices can be researched as an interplay between quality standards emerging from abstracted knowledge ressources such as theory and strategy, and local knowledge work. It may be difficult to balance these forms of knowledge work, and that may explain why leaders often find it hard to use new knowledge resources. The task of making sense of the flow of knowledge and new standards becomes a complex, comprehensive and time-consuming part of practical leadership.
机译：近年来，作为知识工作，我们发现学校领导的复杂性在增加。学校领导可获得的新知识形式，例如绩效数据和基于调查的数据，提高了人们对领导者对这些知识资源进行相关利用的期望。理论和政策声称，新知识在领导决策中起着工具性的作用，但是这对效率思维体系存在重要局限性。本文分析了领导者为发展其领导实践而使用组织评估数据的情况。本文将这个经验对象构造为综合质量标准和有关每所学校的特定知识的组合。问责制实践被认为是特定于特定的学校和专业组织的。本文探讨了如何研究学校领导实践，作为从抽象的知识资源（例如理论和策略）中产生的质量标准与本地知识工作之间的相互作用。平衡这些形式的知识工作可能很困难，这可以解释为什么领导者经常发现很难使用新的知识资源。理解知识流和新标准的任务成为实践领导的复杂，全面和耗时的部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号