...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Sense and Non-Sense of Local–Global Food Chain Comparison, Empirical Evidence from Dutch and Italian Pork Case Studies
【24h】

Sense and Non-Sense of Local–Global Food Chain Comparison, Empirical Evidence from Dutch and Italian Pork Case Studies

机译：本地与全球食物链比较的有理与无理，基于荷兰和意大利猪肉案例研究的经验证据

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Priority setting between local versus global food chains continues to be subject of debate among food, rural and agricultural scholars with an interest in how to support more sustainable food provision and consumption patterns. Recently the FP7 European GLAMUR project targeted to assess and compare the performances of local versus global food chains in a systematic way covering multiple performance dimensions. Especially drawing on empirical research on the performances of three Italian and three Dutch pork chains, it will be argued that meaningful performance comparison needs to acknowledge the complex, multi-facetted and time and place specific interaction patterns between (more) global and (more) local pork chains. Therefore, as regards these pork chains, local–global performance comparison is thought to have hardly significance in isolation from complementary “horizontal” (place-based) and “circular” (waste or by-product valorization oriented) assessments. As will be concluded, this methodological complexity of food chain performance comparison doesn’t allow for simple statements regarding the pros and cons of (more) global versus (more) local pork chains. Hence, it is recommended to avoid such less fruitful local–global dichotomy and to concentrate on more policy relevant questions as: how to facilitate fundamentally different resource-use-efficiency strategies and how to optimize the place-specific interaction between more “local” versus more “global” food systems?
机译：地方与全球食物链之间的优先顺序设置仍然是粮食，农村和农业学者之间争论的话题，他们对如何支持更可持续的粮食供应和消费方式感兴趣。最近，FP7欧洲GLAMUR项目旨在以系统化的方式涵盖多个绩效维度来评估和比较本地与全球食品链的绩效。尤其是基于对三个意大利和三个荷兰猪肉链的绩效的实证研究，将提出有意义的绩效比较需要承认（更多）全球和（更多）之间复杂，多方面以及时间和地点特定的交互模式。当地的猪肉连锁店。因此，就这些猪肉链而言，与补充的“水平”（基于地点）和“循环”（废物或副产品价格导向）评估相辅相成，本地-全球绩效比较被认为几乎没有意义。可以得出结论，这种食物链绩效比较的方法复杂性，无法简单地说明（更多）全球猪肉链与（更多）本地猪肉链的利弊。因此，建议避免卓有成效的本地-全球二分法，而将注意力集中在与政策相关的更多问题上：如如何促进根本不同的资源利用效率策略，以及如何优化更多“本地”与“地方”之间的特定地点互动更多的“全球”食品系统？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号