• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural and Community Development >Bringing Municipalities into Rural Community and Economic Development: Cases from Atlantic Canada
【24h】

Bringing Municipalities into Rural Community and Economic Development: Cases from Atlantic Canada

机译：将市政当局带入农村社区和经济发展：加拿大大西洋沿岸的案例

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In rural development literature, subsidiarity and the merits of local community participation are increasingly extolled. Targeted, nationally-derived sectoral (e.g., agricultural) policies and subsidies are increasingly rejected for a more inclusive, place-based, partnership-driven, community-led, and investment-oriented approach to rural development. This shift can be seen across OECD countries and has been lauded by the organization as 'a new paradigm for rural development.' As such, rural development is conceptualized as a process that emanates from the local level, involving a variety of stakeholders in decision making, such that policy development is viewed as more participatory, reflective of and responsive to community needs. Given this, what role (and capacity) might there be for municipalities to meaningfully engage in rural development activities? This paper examines this question through a case study of two rural Atlantic Canadian communities. In doing so, it finds that these two rural municipalities are institutionally constrained from engaging in rural development initiatives and that provincial and federal funders are focused on economic, rather than community, development. It is argued that municipal capacity needs to be greatly enhanced through institutionalized mechanisms in order for them to become meaningful partners in the development process. Keywords: Atlantic Canada; rural municipalities; new regionalism; community economic development; endogenous development
机译：在农村发展文献中，附属性和地方社区参与的优点日益受到重视。针对农村发展的更具包容性，以地方为基础，以伙伴关系为驱动，以社区为主导和以投资为导向的方法，越来越有针对性的，有针对性的，来自国家的部门性政策（例如农业）政策和补贴遭到拒绝。在经合组织国家中可以看到这种转变，并被该组织称赞为“农村发展的新范例”。因此，农村发展被概念化为一个发自地方一级的过程，使各种利益相关者参与决策，因此政策制定被视为更具参与性，反映并响应了社区需求。鉴于此，市政当局要有意义地参与农村发展活动会发挥什么作用（和能力）？本文通过对两个加拿大大西洋郊区农村社区的案例研究来探讨这个问题。通过这样做，它发现这两个农村市镇在体制上都无法参与农村发展计划，而省和联邦出资者则侧重于经济发展，而不是社区发展。有人认为，必须通过制度化的机制大大提高市政能力，以使它们成为发展进程中有意义的伙伴。关键词：加拿大大西洋;农村自治市;新的区域主义;社区经济发展;内生发展

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号