• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and Commercial Training >The Re-branding Of Management Development As Leadership Development -and Its Dangers
【24h】

The Re-branding Of Management Development As Leadership Development -and Its Dangers

机译：将管理发展重塑为领导力发展及其危害

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the re-branding of much management education and development under the heading of leadership and to identify the dangers this may bring particularly if it results in key management skills being neglected. Design/methodology/approach - The authors use their extensive background in management education and development in the UK and abroad to consider the implications of the increasing emphasis on leadership as opposed to management education and development. Recent trends are identified as is both the distinction between and overlap between the terms leadership and management. Relevant literature is examined and the potential dangers of the re-branding process identified Findings - Increasing use is being made of the term leadership. Whilst there is considerable overlap between the concepts of leadership and management, the market appeal to providers and users of qualification and short course programmes implies that leadership is a higher level of organisational activity than management. This may be an unrealistic view of organisational activity and ignores the concept of strategic management. However, it may create a market pressure for people to aspire to be leaders rather than managers. Four specific potential dangers are identified. These are the lack of emphasis on the need to match people to situations, a failure to distinguish between process and task leadership, the general lack of obvious pathways for people to become leaders rather than managers and neglect of the development of critical managerial skills. Whilst much useful work may take place under the title leadership there is also the overall danger that some of the activity is superficial and even counter-productive. Originality/value - The paper is a timely and necessary counter-balance to the bandwagon effect of the use of the term "leadership" in the generic area of management education and development. It encourages readers to examine carefully what is covered under leadership activities and the extent to which these meet real as opposed to status needs.
机译：目的-本文的目的是研究在领导层领导下进行的许多管理教育和发展的品牌重塑，并确定这可能带来的危险，尤其是如果它导致关键管理技能被忽视的话。设计/方法论/方法-作者利用其在英国和国外进行管理教育和发展的广泛背景，来考虑日益重视领导而非管理教育和发展的影响。最近的趋势被确定为领导和管理之间的区别和重叠。研究了相关文献，并确定了品牌重塑过程的潜在危险。发现-领导一词的使用正在增加。尽管领导力和管理的概念之间有相当大的重叠，但是市场对资格认证和短期课程的提供者和用户的吸引力表明，领导力是组织活动的水平高于管理水平的组织。这可能是对组织活动的不切实际的看法，并且忽略了战略管理的概念。但是，这可能会给人们带来渴望成为领导者而非管理者的市场压力。确定了四个特定的潜在危险。这些是缺乏强调使人与情况相匹配的需要，未能区分流程和任务领导，普遍缺乏明显的使人成为领导者而不是管理者的途径以及对关键管理技能的发展的忽视。尽管在领导层的领导下可能会开展许多有用的工作，但总的来说，有些活动是肤浅的，甚至适得其反。原创性/价值-本文是与管理教育和发展的一般领域中使用“领导”一词所产生的潮流效应相抵触的及时而必要的平衡。它鼓励读者仔细研究领导力活动涵盖的内容以及这些活动满足实际需求而不是满足身份需求的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号