首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of engineering education >Impact of Decision-Making in Capstone Design Courses on Students' Ability to Solve Authentic Problems
【24h】

Impact of Decision-Making in Capstone Design Courses on Students' Ability to Solve Authentic Problems

机译:决策在Capstone设计课程对学生解决真实问题的能力的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous work in problem-solving has been limited by lack of a framework to describe how experts solve authentic problems, and a lack of assessments to measure authentic problem-solving. We have developed an assessment of expert problem-solving in the context of chemical process design to measure how well undergraduate engineering students are learning to solve authentic problems. We measured changes in students' problem-solving over the course of two different capstone design courses to see (1) how much students learned and (2) whether problem-solving outcomes varied between the two courses. We find that students are learning some problem-solving in capstone design courses, but not as much as one might hope: scores on most metrics of expertise range from 30-70%. Variations in what students learned between the two courses can be explained by what decisions students were given an opportunity to practice making during the course. These results suggest that undergraduate students need more deliberate practice making the decisions that expert engineers do as they solve authentic problems.
机译:以前的问题解决方案受到缺乏框架的限制,以描述专家如何解决真实的问题,以及缺乏测量真实问题解决的评估。我们在化学过程设计的背景下制定了对专家问题的评估,以衡量本科工程学生如何学习解决真实问题。我们在两种不同的Capstone设计课程的过程中测量了学生解决问题的变化,以查看(1)学习了多少学生和(2)两种课程之间的问题解决方案是否有所不同。我们发现学生在Capstone设计课程中学习一些解决问题,但并非如此可能希望:大多数专业指标的分数范围为30-70%。两门课程学到的学生的变化可以通过在课程中练习制作的机会的决定来解释什么。这些结果表明,本科生需要更加刻意的实践,使专家工程师在解决真实问题时所做的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号