...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Economic Law >Banking on China's WTO Commitments: ‘Same Bed, Different Dreams’ in China's Financial Services Sector
【24h】

Banking on China's WTO Commitments: ‘Same Bed, Different Dreams’ in China's Financial Services Sector

机译:依靠中国的入世承诺:中国金融服务业的“同床异梦”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Foreign banks and the Chinese Government have different dreams about the business opportunities and obligations that arise under China's World Trade Organization (WTO) commitments on financial services. This article provides an overview of China's banking sector reforms and its gradual opening to foreign participation in the context of General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) rules governing international trade in financial services and the obligations that apply since China's WTO accession in December 2001. The article highlights the contradictory interpretations that China and other Members have issued regarding China's GATS commitments and provides a framework for assessing the WTO consistency of China's banking measures. An analysis is conducted under this framework to evaluate whether China has fully implemented its GATS commitments on (i) the acquisition of Chinese banks by foreign financial institutions, (ii) legitimate ‘prudential regulation’ in the banking sector, and (iii) full market access for credit card and electronic payment services. Notwithstanding the apparent complexity of GATS rules, the article concludes that the WTO legal framework supports the case for increased access to China's financial services market consistent with its GATS commitments, and fully consistent with China's plans for continuing domestic growth and its medium-term financial services export interests.
机译:外国银行和中国政府对于中国在世界贸易组织(WTO)的金融服务承诺下产生的商机和义务有着不同的梦想。本文概述了中国的银行业改革及其在《服务贸易总协定》(GATS)规则中对外国金融服务的逐步开放,该规则规定了国际金融服务贸易以及自2001年12月加入世界贸易组织以来适用的义务。本文着重强调了中国和其他成员国对中国的GATS承诺发表的相互矛盾的解释,并提供了一个评估WTO对中国银行业措施一致性的框架。在此框架下进行分析,以评估中国是否已充分履行其GATS承诺,包括:(i)外国金融机构收购中国银行;(ii)银行业的合法“审慎监管”;以及(iii)全面市场访问信用卡和电子支付服务。尽管GATS规则看起来很复杂,但文章的结论是,WTO法律框架支持根据GATS承诺增加进入中国金融服务市场的理由,并完全符合中国的持续国内增长计划和中期金融服务出口利益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of International Economic Law》 |2008年第1期|p.75-105|共31页
  • 作者

    Daniel C. Crosby*;

  • 作者单位

    * The author practices WTO and international trade law as a partner with the law firm Budin &

    Partners in Geneva, Switzerland Email: daniel.crosby{at}budin.ch.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号