• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of military ethics >THE IBAR BRIDGE ATTACK: A MORAL ASSESSMENT
【24h】

THE IBAR BRIDGE ATTACK: A MORAL ASSESSMENT

机译：IBAR桥袭击：道德评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Rear Admiral Carter's case study is not necessarily an easy one. Deciding whether to spare lives can be a tough challenge, particularly when the decision can have an impact on mission success. Before engaging in a moral consideration about this particular case, it seems worth clarifying a point regarding legality and morality. One should attempt to separate the legal and the moral issues, even though the two are often intertwined as the bulk of the law of armed conflicts rests on moral concerns. In this case it is important to keep in mind that avoiding 'incidental loss of civilian life' is arguably a legal concern and requirement in the first place.1 Morally speaking, avoiding the killing of innocents is not always the only option. As we will see, this case could be seen as problematic, as long as we do not have full information available about the overall consequences of the decision made by the team not to bomb the bridge.
机译：卡特海军上将的案例研究不一定是一件容易的事。决定是否要度过一生可能是一个艰巨的挑战，尤其是当该决定可能对任务的成功产生影响时。在对此特定案件进行道德考虑之前，似乎有必要澄清关于合法性和道德性的观点。尽管武装冲突法的大部分内容都基于道德问题，但两者往往是交织在一起的，因此，人们应该尝试将法律和道德问题分开。在这种情况下，请务必牢记，避免“偶然丧失平民生命”首先是法律上的关注和要求。1从道德上讲，避免杀害无辜并非总是唯一的选择。正如我们将看到的，只要我们不掌握有关团队决定不炸毁桥梁的总体后果的完整信息，这种情况就可以视为问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号