首页> 外文期刊>Journal of organizational behavior management >An Analysis of Organizational Behavior Management Research in Terms of the Three-Contingency Model of Performance Management
【24h】

An Analysis of Organizational Behavior Management Research in Terms of the Three-Contingency Model of Performance Management

机译:基于绩效管理三权模型的组织行为管理研究分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The three-contingency model of performance management (Malott, 1992, 1993, 1999) was used to analyze interventions in the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management (JOBM) from the years 1990 through 2005 (Volume 11[1] -Volume 25 [4]). The current article extends previous reviews (Malott, Shimamune, & Malott, 1992; Otto & Malott, 2004) by assessing how behavior analysts have applied this level of analysis in the description of interventions and the importance of this conceptual precision when describing maintaining variables. All 48 studies meeting criteria for inclusion in the current article involved indirect-acting contingencies with outcomes too delayed to reinforce the causal response. Only 17 of the 24 articles that described the performance-management contingencies described them correctly in terms of the maintaining behavioral mechanisms.
机译:绩效管理的三权变模型(Malott,1992、1993、1999)用于分析1990年至2005年的《组织行为管理杂志》(JOBM)中的干预措施(第11卷[1]-第25卷[4]) )。本篇文章通过评估行为分析师在干预措施的描述中如何应用这种分析水平以及描述保持变量时概念精确性的重要性,扩展了以前的评论(Malott,Shimamune和Malott,1992; Otto和Malott,2004)。符合本篇文章纳入标准的所有48项研究均涉及间接作用的意外事件,其结果过于延迟而无法加强因果关系。在描述性能管理突发事件的24篇文章中,只有17篇从维护行为机制方面正确地描述了它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号