【24h】

Polishing Props

机译:抛光道具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the August 2005 issue of LPM a question came up as to the legality of polished props. We were incorrect to say it was OK. It may get through annuals with no problem, but it won't get through an overhaul at a prop shop without paint—with perhaps a few very rare exceptions called out by the prop manufacturer. A polished prop has had no chemical alterations such as chrome would cause, so what is the problem? Actually, there are several, but it mostly is an issue of procedure—or more specifically, lack of one.
机译:在LPM的2005年8月号中,提出了关于抛光道具的合法性的问题。我们说这没问题是不对的。它可以毫无问题地通过年度检查,但如果没有油漆,就不会在道具商店进行大修—也许道具制造商会提出一些非常罕见的例外。抛光的道具没有化学变化,例如不会引起铬的腐蚀,那么这是什么问题呢?实际上,有几个,但主要是程序问题,或更具体地说,是一个程序问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号