Many scientists are wary of discussing unpublished results with journalists, suggests a meta-analysis of survey data Hans Peter Peters, a social scientist at the Jiilich Research Centre in Germany, examined published and unpublished data that he and his colleagues collected in surveys of US neuroscientists and German scientists. A little more than half of US and German neuroscientists, and 44% of German scientists across all fields, agreed that acceptance of a paper by a journal is threatened if the findings have already been revealed in the mass media. Peters notes that most scientists make a sharp distinction between how they communicate among themselves and how they talk to the media and the public.
展开▼
机译：许多科学家对与记者讨论未发表的结果持谨慎态度，建议对调查数据进行荟萃分析，德国吉利希研究中心的社会科学家汉斯·彼得·彼得斯（Hans Peter Peters）检查了他和他的同事在对美国神经科学家的调查中收集的已发表和未发表的数据。和德国科学家。超过一半的美国和德国神经科学家以及所有领域的44％的德国科学家都同意，如果研究结果已经在大众媒体中披露，则威胁要接受期刊对论文的接受。彼得斯指出，大多数科学家在彼此之间的交流方式以及与媒体和公众的交流方式之间做出了鲜明的区分。
展开▼
