首页> 外文期刊>Nonlinear dynamics, psychology and life sciences >Leadership Emergence in Engineering Design Teams
【24h】

Leadership Emergence in Engineering Design Teams

机译:工程设计团队的领导力出现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Leaders emerge from leaderless groups as part of a more complex emerging social structure. Several studies have shown that the emerging structure is aptly described by a swallowtail catastrophe model where the control parameters differ depending on whether creative problem solving, production, coordination-intensive, or emergency management groups are involved. The present study explored creative problem solving further where the participants were engaged in real-world tasks extending over several months rather than short laboratory tasks. Participants were 144 engineering students who were organized into 28 groups of 4 to 6 people who designed, built, and tested a prototype product that would solve a real-world problem. At the 10' week of work they completed a questionnaire indicating who was most like the leader of their group, second most like the leader, along with 13 other questions about individuals' contributions to the group process. Results showed that the swallowtail model (R~2 = .90) exhibited a strong advantage over the linear alternative model (R~2 = .47) for predicting leadership emergence. The three control variables were control of the task, creative contributions to the group's work, and facilitating the creative contributions of others.
机译:领导者来自无领导者团体,是更复杂的新兴社会结构的一部分。多项研究表明,这种新出现的结构可以通过燕尾灾难模型恰当地描述,其中控制参数取决于是否涉及创造性问题的解决,生产,协作密集或紧急管理小组。本研究进一步探讨了创造性的问题解决方法,其中参与者参与了数月而不是短时间的实验室任务的真实世界任务。参与者是144名工程专业的学生,​​他们被分为28组,每组4至6人,他们设计,制造和测试了可以解决现实问题的原型产品。在工作的10周中,他们完成了一份问卷调查,表明谁最像他们的团队的领导者,第二多像他的领导者,以及其他13个有关个人对小组过程贡献的问题。结果表明,燕尾模型(R〜2 = .90)在预测领导力出现方面优于线性替代模型(R〜2 = .47)。这三个控制变量是任务的控制,对小组工作的创造性贡献以及促进他人的创造性贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号