• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophia >Shari’a Reasoning and the Justice of Religious War
【24h】

Shari’a Reasoning and the Justice of Religious War

机译：伊斯兰教的推理与宗教战争的正义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Most contemporary advocates of the Just War Tradition (JWT) condemn religious war. If they are correct, waging war should be a secular affair, fully justifiable on non-religious grounds. This secularized understanding of the JWT draws on normative commitments that lead many political theorists to advocate in favor of a secularized politics in western liberal polities. As a matter of historical fact and contemporary commitment, many Muslims have rejected the secularized conception of the morality of war found in contemporary conceptions of the JWT. I argue that, given appropriate distinctions between relevantly different kinds of religious war, advocates of the JWT have excellent reason to rethink their antipathy to religious war. Specifically, I argue that distinct kinds of religious war can enjoy differential normative standing and that there is no compelling reason to believe that religiously justified wars must be waged in a morally improper manner, viz., in a way that violates the JWT's in bello requirements.
机译：正义战争传统（JWT）的大多数当代倡导者谴责宗教战争。如果它们是正确的，则发动战争应该是世俗的事情，以非宗教为由是完全合理的。对JWT的世俗化理解是基于规范性承诺，该承诺促使许多政治理论家主张支持西方自由主义政体的世俗化政治。出于历史事实和当代承诺，许多穆斯林拒绝了当代犹太人联合会概念中关于战争道德的世俗化概念。我认为，鉴于在不同类型的宗教战争之间有适当的区别，JWT的拥护者有充分的理由重新考虑他们对宗教战争的反感。具体而言，我认为，不同种类的宗教战争可以享有不同的规范地位，并且没有令人信服的理由相信必须以道德上不当的方式（即违反JWT的最高要求）发动宗教上合理的战争。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号